“Fatal San Francisco dog maul case back in spotlight”: Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has this report on an appeal scheduled for oral argument Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

“Efforts to Rein In Arbitration Come Under Well-Financed Attack”: Jessica Silver-Greenberg and Michael Corkery will have this article in Monday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Rowan’s prayer lawsuit shifted focus following Supreme Court ruling”: The Salisbury (N.C.) Post has this article today about a case that, according to the article, will be orally argued in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in January 2016.

“Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins: The Illusory ‘No-Injury Class’ Reaches the Supreme Court.” Law professor Patricia W. Moore — a contributor to the “Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog” — has posted this paper online at SSRN.

“Supreme Court on C-SPAN, With Warts and All”: Kenneth Jost had this post yesterday at his blog, “Jost on Justice.”

“D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed: Of Dogs and Lions, Heads and Tails.” Aaron Nielson has this post at the blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation.

“‘Jock tax’ changes expected to cost Cleveland millions”: The Cleveland Plain Dealer has this report.

“Gaming Out The Immigration Case As It Heads To The Supreme Court”: Ilya Shapiro has this post today at Forbes.com.

“Will the U.S. Supreme Court Give a Clear Answer on Abortion? On Friday, the justices agreed to hear a challenge to a Texas law that would cut several abortion clinics, forcing them to revisit a vague standard.” Law professor Garrett Epps has this essay online today at The Atlantic.

“Reviewer of emails also was recipient”: In today’s edition of The Philadelphia Inquirer, Angela Couloumbis and Craig R. McCoy have an article that begins, “A member of the judicial panel weighing sanctions against state Supreme Court Justice J. Michael Eakin over offensive emails was himself a recipient of pornographic messages exchanged among another justice and law enforcement officials, documents obtained by The Inquirer show.”

“Suit: Panel illegally rushed nomination of state high court justice.” The Santa Fe New Mexican has this report.