“Court: Stores don’t have to pay for right to sell books on Rosa Parks.” Kent Faulk of The Birmingham News has this report.
At the “THR, Esq.” blog of The Hollywood Reporter, Eriq Gardner has a post titled “Rosa Parks Heirs Lose Legal Battle Over Movie, Books Sold at Target.”
And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Eugene Volokh has a blog post titled “Target has right to sell Rosa Parks biographies, commemorative plaque.”
You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit at this link.
“Obama Administration Opposes Texas Abortion Restrictions; Solicitor general urges Supreme Court to strike down regulations”: Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal has this report.
Update: In other coverage, Joan Biskupic of Reuters reports that “Obama administration asks U.S. top court to reject Texas abortion law.”
“Christian pharmacists appeal ‘conscience’ case to Supreme Court; Oppose Wash. law that says they must dispense Plan B, other products”: Cheryl Wetzstein of The Washington Times has this report.
This post from earlier today contains a link to the petition for a writ of certiorari.
“This Boy’s Life: At 16, Taurus Buchanan threw one deadly punch — and was sent away for life; Will the Supreme Court give him, and hundreds like him, a chance at freedom?” Corey G. Johnson and Ken Armstrong have this article online today at The Marshall Project.
“The First Amendment, the right of publicity, video games and the Supreme Court”: Eugene Volokh has this blog post today at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”
“Unions, Abortion, Obamacare: 3 Supreme Court Cases to Watch in 2016; The 2015-2016 SCOTUS term heats back up.” Damon Root has this post today at the “Hit & Run” blog of Reason.com.
“As Justices Weigh Affirmative Action, Michigan Offers an Alternative”: Anemona Hartocollis will have this article in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.
“Ninth Circuit Judge Richard R. Clifton Announces Intention to Take Senior Status”: The Public Information Office of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued this news release today.
“The Supreme Court’s next big class action controversy: ascertainability.” Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this report today.
“Argument preview: New threat to public-employee unions.” Lyle Denniston has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”
Cert. petition filed today: You can access at this link the petition for a writ of certiorari that I filed today in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of a criminal defendant client in a case arising from the Third Circuit that presents a split among the circuits on an issue of federal statute of limitations law.
“‘Citizens United’ advisory measure can go on ballot, California high court says”: Maura Dolan of The Los Angeles Times has this news update.
And Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News reports that “California Supreme Court backs advisory ballot measures.”
You can access today’s ruling of the Supreme Court of California at this link.
“Pharmacists to Supreme Court: Protect our religious conscience.” The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty issued this news release today. You can view the petition for a writ of certiorari at this ink.
“Supreme Court, in Recusal Case, May Find Itself Looking Inward”: Adam Liptak will have this new installment of his “Sidebar” column in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.
“Appeals court reverses Key West tattoo shop ruling”: The Associated Press has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued last Tuesday.
“D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed: Resolved.” Aaron Nielson has this post at the blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation.
“In U.S., Justice Kennedy Was ‘Person of Year'”: Kenneth Jost had this post yesterday at his blog, “Jost on Justice.”
“Obama’s gun control options each have legal pitfalls”: Reuters has this report.
“Chief Justice Roberts Takes a Fourth Bite at the Apple”: Michael Dorf has this post today at “Dorf on Law.”
And yesterday at the “Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog,” Patricia W. Moore had a post titled “Chief Justice’s Year-End Report Praises Rules Amendments Sought by Corporate Defendants.”
