“A Bad Ruling for Those Who Want to Throttle AT&T”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg View.

“The Court after Scalia: Standing at the crossroads on voting rights.” Law professor Richard L. Hasen — author of the “Election Law Blog” — has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Court: Texas death row inmate may have faked mental illness.” The Associated Press has this report on an unpublished per curiam opinion that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued yesterday.

“Justice Department Gave Supreme Court Incorrect Data in Immigration Case; Department won the 2003 case after understating the time certain immigrants spend in detention without bail”: Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal has this report.

“New York Court Expands Definition of Parenthood”: Alan Feuer of The New York Times has this report.

And The Associated Press has a report headlined “Court: Gays can seek parental rights for nonbiological kids.”

You can access today’s ruling of the Court of Appeals of New York — that state’s highest court — at this link.

“Constitution Check: Might the courts end the Senate impasse on Garland?” Lyle Denniston has this post today at the “Constitution Daily” blog of the National Constitution Center.

“Alleged al Qaeda bomber loses pretrial challenge”: Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has this report.

And The Associated Press reports that “Appeals court refuses to halt trial in USS Cole attack.”

You can access today’s ruling of a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit at this link.

“Court lets suit against maker of blood thinner be tried in SF”: Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle has an article that begins, “Heart patients who say the anticlotting drug Plavix has caused internal bleeding, heart attacks and even deaths can sue manufacturer Bristol-Myers in San Francisco, even though the company and most of the plaintiffs are based in other states, the California Supreme Court ruled Monday.”

You can access yesterday’s 4-to-3 ruling of the Supreme Court of California at this link.

“Court denies appeal in case about Native Hawaiian election”: The Associated Press has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued yesterday.

“Applying Johnson, we join the increasing majority of our sister circuits in holding that the residual clause in [Sentencing Guidelines section] 4B1.2(a)(2) is unconstitutionally vague.” So held a majority of the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in a decision issued yesterday.

“The Honorable Merrick Garland addresses HLS Class of 2019”: Harvard Law School has posted the video of this recent event on YouTube at this link.

And Peter DeMarco of the Harvard Gazette has a report on the event titled “The makings of Merrick Garland: Supreme Court nominee tells new law students it doesn’t take wizardry to thrive, just ‘good choices’”

“Founders Meet Brand X”: David Feder has this post at the “Fed Soc Blog.”

“Strange Goings On in 7th Circuit En Banc WI Voter ID Case: A 9th Vote Appears.” Rick Hasen has this post at his “Election Law Blog.”

You can view the amended en banc per curiam decision that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued yesterday at this link.