“Supreme Court Blocks North Carolina From Restoring Strict Voting Law”: Adam Liptak will have this article in Thursday’s edition of The New York Times.
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court won’t let North Carolina use strict voting law.”
David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court denies North Carolina appeal to enforce its voter ID rules.”
Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court Blocks Stricter Voting Rules in North Carolina; A deadlocked court turns back request to revive rules blocked by lower court.”
Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “U.S. Supreme Court rejects bid to reinstate North Carolina voting limits.”
Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “U.S. High Court Won’t Revive North Carolina Voter-ID Law.”
Ariane de Vogue and Dan Berman of CNN.com report that “Supreme Court won’t reinstate North Carolina voter ID law.”
Cristian Farias of The Huffington Post reports that “Supreme Court Denies North Carolina’s Plea To Restore Swath Of Voting Restrictions; The state won’t be able to enforce them come Election Day.”
And at the “Constitution Daily” blog of the National Constitution Center, Lyle Denniston has a post titled “North Carolina limits on voting remain on hold.”
“Inflatable Rat Case Maybe Moot; Posner Lashes Out”: Nicholas Datlowe of Bloomberg BNA has this report.
“US court upholds ban on gun sales to marijuana card holders”: The Associated Press has a report that begins, “A federal government ban on the sale of guns to medical marijuana card holders does not violate the Second Amendment, a federal appeals court said Wednesday.”
You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at this link.
“US high court refuses to reinstate North Carolina voter ID”: The Associated Press has this report.
And Rick Hasen — en route to Philadelphia, where a certain two law bloggers will be meeting for dinner tomorrow evening — has a post at his “Election Law Blog” titled “#SCOTUS 4-4 Tie in NC Voting Case Leaves Lower Court Ruling in Place and Shows Us Power of Appeals Courts Post-Scalia.”
You can view today’s order of the U.S. Supreme Court at this link.
“U.S. court voids $655 mln verdict against PLO over Israel attacks”: Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has this report.
And The Associated Press reports that “US appeals court tosses out $654 million verdict against PLO.”
You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit at this link.
“Amtrak gets partial victory in U.S. appeal over Sandy insurance”: Nate Raymond of Reuters has this report on a non-precedential decision that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued today.
“Republicans file contempt motion against McAuliffe over felon rights restoration”: Graham Moomaw of The Richmond Times-Dispatch has this report.
And The Associated Press reports that “GOP seeks to block McAuliffe’s latest felon voting effort.”
“We Need Abortion Laws Based on Science”: Ushma D. Upadhyay has this op-ed in today’s edition of The New York Times.
In the September 2016 issue of ABA Journal magazine: Mark Walsh has an article headlined “Supreme Court divided over warrants discovered in illegal stops.”
And David L. Hudson Jr. has an article headlined “New Mexico high court urges judges to be discreet on social media.”
“Gavin Grimm just wanted to use the bathroom; He didn’t think the nation would debate it”: Moriah Balingit has this front page article in today’s edition of The Washington Post.
“Edward Snowden’s Long, Strange Journey to Hollywood: Oliver Stone wanted a hit — and the chance to put America’s most iconic dissident onscreen; The subject wanted veto power; The Russian lawyer wanted someone to option the novel he’d written; The American lawyer just wanted the whole insane project to go away; Somehow a film got made.” Irina Aleksander will have this article in this upcoming Sunday’s edition of The New York Times Magazine.
“North Carolina Republicans Accused of Dodging Order to Fix Election Rules”: Michael Wines has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.
“Grassley hints at Supreme Court confirmation hearing in lame duck”: Nolan D. McCaskill of Politico.com has this report.
And Reuters reports that “Senator Grassley could be persuaded to hold hearing on Garland.”
