“Lessons From Pa.’s Judicial Retirement Age Ballot Fiasco”: Tomorrow’s edition of The Legal Intelligencer — Philadelphia’s daily newspaper for lawyers — will contain this new installment of my monthly “Upon Further Review” column.

The essay’s editor changed my use of the word “cogently” to “gently,” thus adding an unintended aspect of politeness to my appellate column this month.

“The Justices’ Surprising Support (Or Lack Thereof) for the U.S.” Adam Feldman has this post today at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog.

“OT2016 #2: ‘The Worst Part About Being a Supreme Court Justice.'” You can access the second episode of the “First Mondays” podcast, featuring Ian Samuel and Dan Epps, via this link.

“A New Era for the Supreme Court: The transformative potential of a shift in even one seat.” Lincoln Caplan has this article in the Fall 2016 issue of The American Prospect magazine.

“Hillary Clinton Has A Vision For The Supreme Court, And It Looks Like Sonia Sotomayor; Meanwhile, President Barack Obama’s nominee to the high court only got a passing mention, and not even by name”: Cristian Farias of The Huffington Post has this report.

“Subtle Age Discrimination Gets a Court’s Blessing”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg View.

“No Dreadlocks for You: Why banning dreads at work isn’t racially discriminatory, even if it should be illegal.” Law professor Richard Thompson Ford has this jurisprudence essay online today at Slate.

“Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Trump, Kaepernick and her lifelong love of the law”: Yahoo! News has posted online this Katie Couric interview.