“Supreme Court justices question big verdict against Samsung for copying Apple’s iPhone”: David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

And Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Justices lean to Samsung in smartphone design dispute with Apple.”

“Supreme Court Weighs Bias and Secrecy in Jury Deliberations”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined “Supreme Court hears case concerning biased comments in jury room.”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court Weighs Bias Claims in Murder Trial; Justices hear arguments over whether expert witness’s racial comments undermined African-American man’s sentencing.”

And Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Justices divided over jury racism, privacy.”

“Case Accusing Bush Officials of 9/11 Abuses Heads to Supreme Court”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined “Supreme Court to consider lawsuit against former attorney general Ashcroft.”

Josh Gerstein of Politico.com has a blog post titled “Six-justice SCOTUS could decide cases on post-9/11 detentions.”

And at the “Constitution Daily” blog of the National Constitution Center, Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Webster Bivens’ story — an update after a half-century.”

“Supreme Court to decide whether U.S. Border Patrol agent can be sued for shooting Mexican teenager”: David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

“Divided We Stand: Is obstructionism the new normal?” Tracy Schorn has this article in the October 2016 issue of Washington Lawyer, a publication of the DC Bar.

Charlie Rose interviews Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: You can view the interview online in two parts: part one and part two.

“The Consumer Protection Agency Is Unusual. It’s Not Unconstitutional.” Law professor Cass R. Sunstein has this essay online at Bloomberg View.

Online at The Los Angeles Times, business columnist Michael Hiltzik has an essay titled “A conservative federal judge takes an overheated slap at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.”

And at the “Notice & Comment” blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation, Aaron Nielson has a post yesterday titled “D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed: A Primer on Today’s CFPB Decision.”

“What a Court Got Wrong About Dreadlocks and Race”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg View.

“Bloomberg Law: Former Solicitor General Don Verrilli.” Donald Verrilli speaks with Greg Stohr and June Grasso in a podcast you can access via this link.

“Adelson sighting could ‘implicate’ Markel’s ex”: Sean Rossman has this front page article in today’s edition of The Tallahassee Democrat. In addition, Rossman has an article headlined “No bond for Katherine Magbanua in Markel killing.”

And Karl Etters of The Tallahassee Democrat has articles headlined “Wendi Adelson’s attorney questions Rivera’s credibility” and “Rivera: ‘We were coming up here to kill somebody.’”

“Death sentence in doubt?” In today’s edition of The Oklahoman, Chris Casteel has a front page article that begins, “The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered a new review of the death sentence given to an Oklahoma man convicted of killing a woman and her two children.”

Also in today’s edition of The Oklahoman, Nolan Clay has a front page article headlined “Some death row inmates have been executed despite same error in their cases; one resentenced to life.”

“Ruth Bader Ginsburg Was Never Really ‘Notorious RBG’: Her attacks on Colin Kaepernick dispel that myth once and for all.” Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.