“Mike Lee explains why the GOP will block Garland even if Clinton wins”: James Hohmann of The Washington Post has this report.

“An independent U.S. agency’s independence gets it into trouble”: Lyle Denniston has this post today at the “Constitution Daily” blog of the National Constitution Center.

And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Stuart Benjamin has a post titled “D.C. Circuit buries Supreme Court precedent.”

“Paterson council rejects $1.6M deal in US Supreme Court case on campaign sign”: Joe Malinconico has this front page article in today’s edition of The Record of Hackensack, New Jersey.

“The Supreme Court Debates Juror Bias: And Samuel Alito complains about oversensitive PC college students.” Mark Joseph Stern has this Supreme Court dispatch online at Slate.

“Two years later, few Hobby Lobby copycats emerge”: Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico.com has this report.

“In major decision, 10th Circuit rules Wyoming can’t force BLM to remove wild horses”: Arno Rosenfeld of The Caspar Star Tribune has this report.

And Tom McGhee of The Denver Post reports that “Federal appeals court in Denver dismisses lawsuit calling for wild horse roundup in Wyoming; Wyoming sued the BLM, saying it failed to keep wild horses within certain range land.”

You can access Tuesday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit at this link.

Immigrants categorized as “habitual drunkards” may have rejoiced too soon, as the Ninth Circuit yesterday granted rehearing en banc, vacating recent panel victory: You can access yesterday’s order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granting rehearing en banc at this link.

My earlier coverage of the original divided three-judge Ninth Circuit panel’s ruling in the case can be accessed here.

“New hope for undocumented immigrants: DAPA might not be dead — a bold legal strategy could protect millions from deportation; A series of legal end runs may succeed in restoring Obama’s protections for millions of undocumented immigrants.” Daniel Denvir of Salon.com has this report.

Eighth Circuit panel reverses course, ordering that Missouri Department of Corrections need not reveal information regarding use of pentobarbital in executions, including the identity of its anonymous supplier: You can access today’s per curiam ruling of a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at this link.

Update: In early news coverage, The Associated Press reports that “Court reversal shields Missouri’s execution drug provider.”

“Death sentence overturned for Cleveland man convicted in 1985 murder”: Eric Heisig has this front page article in today’s edition of The Cleveland Plain Dealer.

And The Associated Press reports that “Appeals court overturns death sentence in 1985 Ohio slaying.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of a partially divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit at this link.

Duke Law School’s Appellate Litigation Clinic wins Third Circuit RFRA appeal on behalf of federal prison inmate: You can access Tuesday’s ruling of a partially divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at this link.

Duke Law previously issued a news release about the case titled “Taylor ’16 argues federal appeal in Third Circuit.”

“Abbott and Costello Heirs Lose Appeal Over Broadway Play’s Use of ‘Who’s on First’ Routine; ‘Hand of God’ producers beat lawsuit — not because of fair use, but because the heirs haven’t demonstrated ownership of a valid copyright”: Eriq Gardner has this post at the “THR, Esq.” blog of The Hollywood Reporter about a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued on Tuesday.

“Supreme Court deals blow to out-of-state companies on taxes”: Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle has this report.

“The D.C. Circuit’s gratuitous ruling on CFPB constitutionality”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post.

“Clinton’s vow to push Supreme Court left galvanizes conservatives wary of Trump”: S.A. Miller of The Washington Times has this report.

“Let’s Legislate From the Supreme Court Bench”: Linda Greenhouse has this essay online today at The New York Times.