15 years of “How Appealing” — reader mail: Today’s email is from an attorney who asked that I not identify him by name:

I wanted you to know that I have been a loyal reader from the beginning. I practice in a rather niche area and don’t see many appeals, but I almost always find something useful or at least interesting in the cases you cover. I also appreciate the gentle humor in your posts.

Keep on trucking, brakes unfrozen.

Thanks for that very kind email and for the frozen trucker reference it contains. I will post another reader email tomorrow. This feature will conclude with a final reader email — one of my favorites — on Wednesday, the last day of the month in which this blog celebrates its birthday.

“White House Acts to Roll Back Birth-Control Mandate for Religious Employers”: Robert Pear of The New York Times has this report.

“Redskins trademark, secular activities at churches cases among anticipated Supreme Court decisions”: Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times has this report.

“Travel ban to test Supreme Court view of presidential power”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.

“Supreme Court’s next step on gerrymandering could be its biggest yet”: Ariane de Vogue of CNN.com has this report.

“D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed: En Banc Oral Argument (Part I).” Aaron Nielson has this post at the “Notice & Comment” blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation.

“A Constitutional Puzzle: Can the President Be Indicted?” Adam Liptak will have this new installment of his “Sidebar” column in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.

“OT2016 #22: ‘Golden Phoenix.'” You can access this week’s new episode of the “First Mondays” podcast, featuring Ian Samuel and Dan Epps, via this link.