“LinkedIn data-scraping case highlights calls for SCOTUS review of computer fraud law”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post.

“Texas is Ground Zero as Trump steers the federal judiciary to the right; With 13 federal spots open, Trump set to impact legal climate”: Kevin Diaz of The Houston Chronicle has this report.

“Lawsuit over false online data revived after U.S. top court review”: Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued today.

“Tech companies urge Supreme Court to boost cellphone privacy”: Andrew Chung of Reuters has this report.

“We Have Every Free PACER Opinion on CourtListener.com”: Free Law Project has this post.

“Showdown Coming over Antidiscrimination Law”: Mark Pulliam has this post at the blog of the Library of Law and Liberty about the Second Circuit’s decision to rehear en banc a case asking whether Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination encompasses discrimination based on sexual orientation.

And at Fortune.com, law professor Andrew Koppelman recently had a related post titled “Why the Trump Administration Will Lose its Case Against Gay Rights.”

“A Top Lawyer Asks Supreme Court To Hear A Major Death Penalty Case; In a new filing, Neal Katyal is asking the high court to consider Arizona’s death penalty law — and whether the death penalty itself is unconstitutional”: Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed News has this report.

“Assessing the Path to Confirmation for Current and Future Trump Nominees to the Third Circuit”: That was my proposed headline for this month’s installment of my “Upon Further Review” column, which appears in today’s print edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Philadelphia’s daily newspaper for lawyers.