“My attempt at jury duty failed — because I’m a nursing mother”: Judith P. Miller has this essay online at The Chicago Tribune.

“Trump’s Latest Travel Ban Could Be the Toughest to Challenge; Earlier iterations of the executive order were rushed and unpolished; But the third version could very well pass the Supreme Court’s test”: Law professor Garrett Epps has this essay online at The Atlantic.

“The Left’s New Plan to Gut Religious-Liberty Protections; In a flurry of pending court cases, liberals are arguing for a radical reinterpretation of the Constitution’s establishment clause”: Margot Cleveland has this essay online at National Review.

This Red Hot class action doesn’t belong in federal court, Eighth Circuit rules: You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at this link.

“Why courts ruled in NFL’s favor, allowing league to enforce Ezekiel Elliott’s suspension immediately”: Kate Hairopoulos has this front page article in today’s edition of The Dallas Morning News.

Drew Davison of The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports that “Court ruling OKs NFL’s investigation process, Ezekiel Elliott now suspended.”

In today’s edition of The New York Times, Benjamin Hoffman has an article headlined “Ezekiel Elliott’s 6-Game N.F.L. Suspension Reinstated by Court.”

Lauren Theisen of Deadspin.com reports that “Appeals Court Vacates Ezekiel Elliott’s Injunction, Clears Path To Suspension.”

At SI.com’s “MMQB” blog, Michael McCann has a post titled “Ezekiel Elliott Suspension: Breaking Down Remaining Legal Options for the Cowboys RB.”

And Austin Knoblauch of NFL.com has a report titled “What happens next in the Ezekiel Elliott case?”

Yesterday, a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued this non-precedential ruling in the case.

Update: After this post originally appeared, the Fifth Circuit reissued its ruling in this case as a published decision.