“‘The Waiver Process Is Fraud’: Previously undisclosed statements from two consular officers raise questions about the legality of the Trump administration’s third travel ban.” Jeremy Stahl has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed: Let’s Be Practical.” Aaron Nielson has this post at the “Notice & Comment” blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation.

“U.S. does not have to pay insurers for Obamacare ‘risk corridor’ — court”: Nate Raymond of Reuters has this report (subscription required for full access) on a ruling that a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued yesterday.

“En Banc Denied: Walker Process Claims Stay out of the Federal Circuit.” Dennis Crouch has this post at his “Patently-O” blog about an order denying rehearing en banc, and the dissent therefrom, that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued today.

“Martins Beach: Surfers tell Supreme Court billionaire Vinod Khosla has no right to block public from shoreline.” Paul Rogers has this front page article in today’s edition of The San Jose Mercury News. You can view the brief in opposition filed in the U.S. Supreme Court at this link.

“‘Bourbon War’ Ends After Skirmish in Sixth Circuit”: Kevin Koeninger of Courthouse News Service has this report on a ruling that Circuit Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton issued yesterday on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

“The Supreme Court Made a Good Decision on Election Law: In praise of the ruling in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky.” Law professor Richard L. Hasen — author of the “Election Law Blog” — has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

And Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern has a jurisprudence essay titled “The Sam Alito Treatment: How the conservative justice’s searingly funny questions doomed Minnesota’s ban on political apparel at the polls.”