“Supreme Court to Rule on 40-Foot War Memorial Cross at Center of Church-State Debate”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Ann E. Marimow have an article headlined “Supreme Court will take case on constitutional challenge to Maryland’s Peace Cross.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has an article headlined “Supreme Court to decide on 40-foot cross: Is it a war memorial or an official display of religion?”

Richard Wolf of USA Today has an article headlined “Supreme Court’s latest church-state conundrum: Must a ‘peace cross’ memorial to World War I vets come down?”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court to Hear Case on Giant Cross on Public Maryland Land; A federal appeals court found that the WWI memorial violated the separation of church and state.”

Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times reports that “Supreme Court to decide whether Bladensburg cross memorial is legal.”

Jessica Gresko of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court agrees to hear Maryland cross memorial case.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “U.S. top court takes up religious dispute over Maryland cross.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Supreme Court to Rule on 40-Foot Cross in New Church-State Test.”

And Ariane de Vogue of CNN reports that “Supreme Court takes up Maryland Peace Cross case.”

“The Harvard Trial: A Double-Edged Sword for College Admissions.” Anemona Hartocollis has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Sean Lee and Sammy Mohammed of The Stanford Daily report that “Stanford defends Harvard in lawsuit on alleged anti-Asian-American admissions processes.”

Collin Binkley of The Associated Press reports that “Harvard bias suit now in judge’s hands.”

Ted Siefer and Nate Raymond of Reuters report that “Harvard defends admission policy as Asian-American bias trial ends.”

Joan Biskupic of CNN reports that “Harvard affirmative action trial arguments come to a close.”

Zack Huffman of Courthouse News Service reports that “Fate of Harvard Admissions Suit Left in Judge’s Hands.”

Adam Harris of The Atlantic has an article headlined “The Stakes for the Harvard Trial Are Higher Now That It’s Over: The Ivy has spent the past three weeks being grilled about whether it discriminates in its admissions process; But the legal battle over affirmative action will likely rage until the Supreme Court weighs in.”

Yesterday’s broadcast of The PBS NewsHour contained a video segment titled “Could Harvard discrimination case change college admissions nationwide?”

And from Boston’s WBUR Radio, Paris Alston, Max Larkin, and Callum Borchers have an audio segment titled “The Harvard Admissions Trial Has Come To A Close For Now, But How Might It Impact Affirmative Action In College Admissions?“