“Capitol conundrum: Should Texas change how judges are elected?” Chuck Lindell of The Austin American-Statesman has this report.

“After 40 Years, C-Span’s Founder Signs Off; Brian Lamb, the man who put Congress on live television, reflects on the results and explains why the Supreme Court ought to be next”: In today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Kyle Peterson has this new installment of “The Weekend Interview.”

“Trump campaign punishes Don McGahn’s law firm; ‘Why in the world would you want to put your enemy on the payroll?’ said one adviser close to the White House”: Nancy Cook of Politico has this report.

“New Hampshire’s Supreme Court Explained; or the Case of the Green Beans”: New Hampshire Public Radio has this report.

“Supreme Court To Decide If Trump Can Add Citizenship Question To Census; Advocates warn that the question will reduce responses to the decennial survey, with serious consequences for the nation”: Sam Levine of HuffPost has this report.

And online at The Washington Post, columnist George F. Will has an essay titled “Wilbur Ross acted wretchedly. But his census decision may be legal.”

“Quest for food stamp data lands newspaper at Supreme Court”: Jessica Gresko of The Associated Press has this report.

“Supreme Court, without being asked, takes up second lawsuit over powers of Tony Evers, Josh Kaul”: Molly Beck of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has this report.

And earlier this week, Patrick Marley of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that “Wisconsin Supreme Court takes up lawsuit over lame-duck laws, putting one case on a fast track.”