“Roberts Wants to Ignore Trump’s Anti-Immigrant Bias Again; The Supreme Court seems likely to accept the administration’s cover story and allow a citizenship question on the census”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion.

“The Supreme Court Is Poised to Shred Its Credibility to Let Trump Rig the Census”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“Constitutionality of Colorado large-capacity magazine ban to be decided in state’s highest court; Lawmakers passed the reform in the wake of the Aurora theater shooting”: Elise Schmelzer of The Denver Post has this report.

“Twice victorious at Supreme Court, Singer Island man prepares for another fight locally”: Andrew Lofholm of NBC affiliate WPTV of West Palm Beach, Florida has a report that begins, “You might remember the name, Fane Lozeman. He has a long history of taking on Riviera Beach and winning, including twice at the United States Supreme Court. Lozeman is back at Riviera Beach City Hall with another fight.”

“Puerto Rico Board Takes Fight Over Members to Supreme Court”: Michelle Kaske of Bloomberg News has this report.

“Can an unconscious suspect consent to a blood draw? Supreme Court says maybe so, maybe not.” Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report.

Jessica Gresko of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court struggles with Wisconsin drunken driving law.”

Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung of Reuters report that “Supreme Court stumped by the case of the unconscious drunken driver.”

And earlier, Bruce Vielmetti of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that “A Wisconsin DUI case in which police drew blood from an unconscious man is headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

You can access at this link the transcript of today’s U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Mitchell v. Wisconsin, No. 18-6210.

“A ‘view’ from the courtroom: Counting to five.” Mark Walsh has this post at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Sotomayor takes liberal lead in challenging admin on census”: Joan Biskupic of CNN has this report.

“Judge Posner, Title VII and Why Sexual Orientation Discrimination is Discrimination Based on ‘Sex'”: Eric Segall has this post at “Dorf on Law.”

“Chalking Tires and the Fourth Amendment: A markedly interesting case from the Sixth Circuit.” Orin Kerr has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”

“How John Roberts Is Shaping the Supreme Court’s Newly Savage Death Penalty Jurisprudence”: Steven V. Mazie has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“On Census Citizenship Question, Supreme Court’s Conservatives Appear United”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Robert Barnes and Mark Berman of The Washington Post report that “Supreme Court’s conservatives appear likely to let Trump add citizenship question to 2020 Census.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court conservatives appear ready to OK Trump’s census citizenship question.”

Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal report that “Supreme Court Reveals Deep Divisions on 2020 Census Citizenship Question; High court’s conservative majority appears sympathetic to Trump administration; liberal justices voice opposition.”

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court looks likely to back Trump administration on adding citizenship question to 2020 census.”

Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times has an article headlined “Justice Sotomayor: Hispanics have ‘rational fear’ of Trump administration citizenship question.”

Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Court hears arguments over citizenship question on census.”

Andrew Chung and Lawrence Hurley of Reuters report that “Trump on track for Supreme Court victory on census citizenship question.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Supreme Court Signals Support for Trump’s Census Citizenship Question.”

Ariane de Vogue of CNN reports that “Supreme Court conservatives appear to lean toward allowing citizenship question on census.”

Josh Gerstein and Ted Hesson of Politico report that “Supreme Court divided on citizenship question for census.”

And Jacqueline Thomsen of The Hill reports that “Conservative justices signal willingness to allow Trump’s census citizenship question.”

Access today’s ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in an argued case: The Court today issued a per curiam decision dismissing the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted in Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian, No. 18-459. You can access the oral argument via this link.