“Justice Clarence Thomas Speaks at Supreme Court Historical Society Annual Lecture”: C-SPAN has posted this video online.

“Appeals court rules against woman charged in Dan Markel murder”: Jeff Burlew of The Tallahassee Democrat has this report on a ruling that a divided three-judge panel of Florida’s First District Court of Appeal issued on Friday.

“The Destruction of 6 Dallas Love Field Gates Could Be Headed to the Supreme Court”: Gary Leff has this post at his “View from the Wing” blog.

At “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Ilya Somin has a blog post titled “The Supreme Court Should Take the Love Terminal Takings Case; A lower court decision the Supreme Court is currently considering reviewing has important — and dangerous — implications for property rights.”

And earlier at the Hover Institution’s “Defining Ideas” blog, Richard A. Epstein had a post titled “Plunder At Love Field.”

“Dicta and the Original Meaning of Article III”: Michael C. Dorf has this interesting post at his “Dorf on Law” blog.

“At the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas Scoffs at Retirement Rumors”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Ariane de Vogue of CNN reports that “Clarence Thomas questions sources of retirement rumors.”

Zack Budryk of The Hill reports that “Clarence Thomas has ‘no idea’ where retirement rumors come from.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Mark Walsh has a post titled “Justice Thomas says he has ‘no stress’ and is ‘doing fine.’“

“Where We Stand at the Beginning of June”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog.

“America’s Abortion Debate Is Serious Not Literal”: Greg Weiner has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog.

“Clarence Thomas says he has ‘no idea’ where retirement rumors started”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report.

“Census Target: John Roberts; Liberals spin a memo to influence the Chief Justice in a crucial case.” This editorial appears in today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

And online at The New York Times, columnist David Leonhardt has an essay titled “A Partisan Grab, in Six Steps: Will the Supreme Court act as a Republican branch?“

Access today’s rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court in argued cases: The Court issued rulings in four argued cases.

1. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch delivered the opinion of the Court in Azar v. Allina Health Services, No. 17-1484. Justice Stephen G. Breyer issued a dissenting opinion. And Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh did not participate. You can access the oral argument via this link.

2. Justice Breyer delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Taggart v. Lorenzen, No. 18-489. You can access the oral argument via this link.

3. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Fort Bend County v. Davis, No. 18-525. You can access the oral argument via this link.

4. And Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in Mont v. United States, No. 17-8995. Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Gorsuch joined. You can access the oral argument via this link.

Access today’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court: At this link. The Court granted review in three new cases and called for the views of the Solicitor General in an original case.

“John Roberts Strikes a Blow Against Free Speech: A First Amendment tiger for the rights of rich campaign donors, the chief justice frets that ordinary people might bother hardworking officers.” Law professor Garrett Epps has this essay online at The Atlantic.

“Inside Pete Buttigieg’s plan to overhaul the Supreme Court; No other candidate has made it central to his or her rationale for running and proposed presidential agenda”: Josh Lederman of NBC News has this report.