How Appealing



Saturday, October 19, 2019

“Immigration Cases, Judicial Vacancies Tax New Mexico Courts; ‘It’s crushing’; judges, some from as far away as New York and New Hampshire have been called in to help”: Alicia A. Caldwell and Dan Frosch of The Wall Street Journal have this report.

Posted at 10:50 PM by Howard Bashman



“The people know what laws mean. The Supreme Court shouldn’t try to rewrite them.” Columnist Hugh Hewitt has this essay online at The Washington Post.

Posted at 5:03 PM by Howard Bashman



“Supreme Court to Consider Challenge to Quick Deportations of Some Seeking Asylum; Case stems from petition from Sri Lankan man who argued he hadn’t been given a meaningful opportunity to make his plea for asylum”: Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal have this report.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court will rule on expedited removal of those denied asylum requests.”

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Trump administration’s effort to speed removal of migrants seeking asylum headed to Supreme Court.”

Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle reports that “Supreme Court to hear Trump challenge on expedited deportations rulings.”

Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court takes up case over quick deportations.”

Andrew Chung of Reuters reports that “U.S. Supreme Court to hear Trump appeal over rapid deportation dispute.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Trump Administration Gets High Court Review on Quick Deportation.”

Ariane de Vogue and Priscilla Alvarez of CNN report that “Supreme Court to consider rights of asylum seekers to challenge expedited removal orders.”

Harper Neidig of The Hill reports that “Supreme Court to hear case over quick deportations.”

And Megan Mineiro of Courthouse News Service reports that “Sri Lankan Fighting Deportation Will Get High Court Audience.”

Posted at 11:20 AM by Howard Bashman



“Supreme Court will decide constitutionality of consumer watchdog bureau”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report.

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court will hear challenge to autonomy of consumer agency spearheaded by Elizabeth Warren.”

Yuka Hayashi and Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal report that “Supreme Court to Consider Structure of Consumer Finance Watchdog; Critics say Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s leadership is unconstitutional because of accountability issues.”

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court agrees to hear case challenging independence of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.”

Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times reports that “Supreme Court to decide whether Obama-era Wall Street cop is legal; CFPB was Elizabeth Warren’s pet project.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “Supreme Court takes up challenge to consumer protection agency.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Supreme Court Agrees to Consider Curbing CFPB’s Independence.”

Ariane de Vogue of CNN reports that “Supreme Court will hear constitutional challenge to structure of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.”

Danielle Wallace of Fox News reports that “Supreme Court to decide if Obama-era Wall Street watchdog agency is constitutional.”

Tucker Higgins of CNBC reports that “Supreme Court will hear challenge to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.”

Katy O’Donnell of Politico reports that “Supreme Court to review Trump-backed challenge to consumer bureau.”

Sylvan Lane and Harper Neidig of The Hill report that “Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to consumer agency.”

At the “Constitution Daily” blog of the National Constitution Center, Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Justices reopen major dispute on presidential power.”

And in commentary, online at Vox, Ian Millhiser has an essay titled “The Supreme Court will decide if Trump can fire the CFPB director; The implications are enormous; A war over the limits of Trump’s power is about to get real.”

Posted at 11:09 AM by Howard Bashman



“Over My Dead Body”: The October 11, 2019 broadcast of the ABC News program “20/20” focused on the trial of two suspects accused in the murder of Dan Markel. You can now freely access the video of the entire broadcast via this link.

Posted at 10:36 AM by Howard Bashman