“Will the Supreme Court Stand Up for an Unarmed Mexican Teenager Shot by a Border Agent? At stake is whether people will still be able to sue federal officials for violating the Constitution.” Linda Greenhouse has this essay online at The New York Times.

“Institute Gives $1 Million Prize to Justice Ginsburg; Money will be distributed to charities and nonprofits she designates”: Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal has this report.

“Injured worker may proceed with suit against Canada”: Angela Childers of Business Insurance had this report back in June 2019 about the ruling of a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Today, the First Circuit issued an order denying rehearing en banc by an evenly divided court. Two judges issued a dissent urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review.

“9th Circuit rules that arbitrators must disclose ownership stakes”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post about a ruling that a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued yesterday.

“Ninth Cir. Refusal to Review Asylum Case Draws Scornful Dissents”: Bernie Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on an order denying rehearing en banc, and the dissents therefrom, that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued yesterday.

“Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Mourns Loss of Chief Judge Emeritus Procter R. Hug, Jr.” The Public Information Office of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued this news release today.

“‘The Idea Was To Get Rid Of Me’: Justice Clarence Thomas Speaks About His Confirmation Fight in New Documentary.” Tessa Berenson of Time magazine has this report.

“The Resilience of Obamacare in Reality if not Necessarily in the Trump-Packed Courts”: Michael C. Dorf has this post at his blog, “Dorf on Law.”

“Susan Collins Will Oppose Controversial Judicial Nominee Steven Menashi; She is the first Republican senator to come out against Trump’s court pick, who has a record of opposing rights for women, LGBTQ people and minorities”: Jennifer Bendery of HuffPost has this report.

“The Judges Republicans Are Doing It All For: Trump nominated his fifth judge rated ‘not qualified’ by the American Bar Association this week; She’s never tried a case.” Dahlia Lithwick has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“Trump Taxes: Judges Seem Skeptical of Bid to Block Subpoena for Returns; President Trump is appealing a ruling ordering him to abide by a subpoena from state prosecutors to turn over eight years of tax returns.” Benjamin Weiser and Azi Paybarah of The New York Times have this report.

Ann E. Marimow and Jonathan O’Connell of The Washington Post report that “In court hearing, Trump lawyer argues a sitting president would be immune from prosecution even if he were to shoot someone.”

Brendan Pierson of Reuters reports that “Trump could shoot someone and escape prosecution, his lawyer argues.”

Bob Van Voris of Bloomberg News reports that “Trump Lawyer Sees Presidential Immunity — Even for Shooting.”

Pete Williams of NBC News has a report headlined “Trump’s lawyers argue he can’t be charged while in office — even if he shoots someone; ‘That’s your position?’ asked federal appeals court Judge Denny Chin. ‘That is correct,’ the president’s lawyer responded.”

And Marshall Cohen of CNN reports that “Trump couldn’t be prosecuted for a Fifth Avenue shooting while in office, his lawyer argues.”

C-SPAN has posted online at this link the audio of today’s oral argument before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

“Supreme Court Lets Climate Change Lawsuit Proceed; The court’s brief order addressed a threshold question: Should climate suits filed by state and local governments be heard in state or federal court?” Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

And Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Oil Companies Rejected by Supreme Court on Climate Change Suits.”

You can access yesterday’s order of the U.S. Supreme Court at this link.

“Cortez fisherman struggles after Supreme Court win”: In today’s edition of The Sarasota Herald-Tribune, columnist Chris Anderson has a front page essay that begins, “Cortez fisherman John Yates had a bizarre conviction for missing grouper overturned by the Supreme Court in 2015. It came at a cost.”

“Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan shares wisdom, laughs Tuesday during CU Boulder lecture”: Kelsey Hammon has this front page article in today’s edition of The Boulder Daily Camera.

“Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to teach UF law class”: April Rubin of The Independent Florida Alligator has this report.

“Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg awarded $1 million prize for ‘thinkers’ in philosophy and culture”: Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report.

“Associate Justice Elena Kagan says U.S. Supreme Court not partisan, despite current political climate; The justice spoke Tuesday night at CU Boulder”: Saja Hindi of The Denver Post has this report.

The University of Colorado Law School has posted the video of Justice Kagan’s remarks on YouTube at this link.

“An overlooked consequence of the Supreme Court’s gerrymandering rulings: Stricter abortion laws.” Reis Thebault of The Washington Post has this report.

Seventh Circuit judges spar over existence or non-existence of requirement that preliminary injunction be set forth in a separate document: See this interim order that a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued last Friday.

Last month, Lorraine Bailey of Courthouse News Service covered the oral argument of the appeal in an article headlined “Panel Sympathetic to Budweiser in Spat Over Corn Syrup Ads.”

“Ninth Circuit Upholds Block on Expanded Exemptions for Birth Control Coverage”: Nicholas Iovino of Courthouse News Service has this report.

Mary Anne Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law has a report headlined “Trump Birth Control Religious Opt-Out Properly Blocked: Ninth Circuit.”

And in commentary, online at The Los Angeles Times, Jon Healey has an essay titled “California’s battle with Trump over contraception isn’t just about contraception.”

You can access today’s ruling of a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at this link.

“Court weighing whether judge can unseal lynching records”: Kate Brumback of The Associated Press has this report.

Mark Strassmann of CBS News reports that “Activists hope answers about 1946 lynchings will bring ‘healing.’”

And Kayla Goggin of Courthouse News Service reports that “En Banc 11th Circuit Hears Bid to Release Lynching Records.”

“Democrats call Trump ‘increasingly brazen’ in emoluments court filing, citing Doral G7 proposal”: Ariane de Vogue and Katelyn Polantz of CNN have this report.

And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Josh Blackman has a post titled “George Washington and the Emoluments Clauses: The Practices of our First President Suggest That President Trump is not violating the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses.”

“Laura Kelly will soon pick a Supreme Court justice. One finalist could spur backlash.” Jonathan Shorman of The Wichita Eagle has this report.

“People still trust the Supreme Court. Democrats, don’t mess that up.” Columnist Kathleen Parker has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Thirteen Candidates the Next Democratic President Should Seriously Consider For the Supreme Court”: Harsh Voruganti has this post at his “The Vetting Room” blog, along with a post titled “Initial Thoughts on the Demand Justice Shortlist.”

“When the Government Seizes Your Embryos; In Poland, single women who have frozen embryos are now barred from accessing them”: Anna Louie Sussman has this post online at The New Yorker.

“A new poll finds strong support for the Supreme Court ending LGBTQ discrimination; Neil Gorsuch’s fears of ‘social upheaval’ don’t seem justified”: Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox.

“Supreme Court Justice Kagan encourages, amuses crowd at U lecture; Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan shares insights, anecdotes at U”: Rochelle Olson of The Minneapolis Star Tribune has this report.

Joe Kelly of the Minnesota Daily reports that “Supreme Court Justice Kagan visits UMN, speaks on gender diversity of the court; Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan shared her thoughts on female representation on the court and her love for the job.”

Steve Karnowski of The Associated Press has a report headlined “Justice Kagan: High court must avoid partisan perceptions.”

And Matt Sepic of MPR News has a report headlined “Justice Kagan: U.S. Supreme Court more complicated than the divided public knows.”

“Roger Stone’s Plea for Social Media Comeback Fails at Appeals Court”: Andrew M Harris of Bloomberg News has this report.

Josh Gerstein of Politico reports that “Court rejects Roger Stone challenge to gag order.”

And Zoe Tillman of BuzzFeed News reports that “Roger Stone Lost His Appeal Of The Gag Order Barring Him From Posting On Twitter, Facebook, And Instagram; Stone’s trial is set to begin next month.”

You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit at this link.

“Judge sets retrial date for Katherine Magbanua in Dan Markel killing”: Jeff Burlew of The Tallahassee Democrat has this report.

“Ruth Bader Ginsburg visits UC Berkeley, recounts her fights for women’s rights”: Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle has this report.

Casey Tolan of The East Bay Times reports that “Ruth Bader Ginsburg reassures fans she’s doing ‘very well’ at UC Berkeley talk; ‘If you have survived cancer, you have a zest for life that you didn’t before.’”

And Ariane de Vogue and Chandelis Duster of CNN report that “Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she never stopped working out during pancreatic cancer treatment.”

The UC Berkeley School of Law has posted on YouTube a video of the event titled “A Conversation with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.”

“Textualism as pretext in the LGBTQ discrimination cases”: Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag have this post at the “SCOTUS OA” blog.

“Justice Story on Originalism and Judicial Independence; An old argument against ‘flexible and changeable interpretation'”: Stephen Sachs has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”

“Family suing for wrongful death in son’s 2013 killing by Kaufman County deputies”: Fox 4 News of Dallas-Fort Worth had this report back in March 2016.

Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued this order, and dissents therefrom, denying rehearing en banc by a 10-to-6 vote from a divided three-judge panel’s ruling reversing the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the county. [Update: This post has been corrected to delete language that erroneously stated that the three-judge panel had reversed the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the deputies. In fact, the panel affirmed that aspect of the district court’s ruling. Thanks to the reader who drew this error to my attention.]

“9th Circuit Upholds No Fly List Against Due Process Challenges”: Bernie Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued today.