“A Look At How The Supreme Court Chief Justice May Preside Over Senate Impeachment”: Nina Totenberg had this audio segment on this evening’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered.”

“Why Has a Federal Appeals Court Been Sitting on a Major Case for 32 Months? Indiana’s same-sex parents are trapped in legal limbo, and no one can explain why.” Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

And just yesterday, Patrick Marley of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel noted on Twitter another case that the Seventh Circuit is taking a while to decide.

“Is John Roberts a Closeted Never-Trumper? Reading Between the Lines of the Chief Justice’s Year-End Report.” Law professor Michael C. Dorf has this essay online at Justia’s Verdict.

“Remembering the Anti-Federalists Rightly”: Nathan Coleman has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog.

“On Visiting”: Law professor Tess Wilkinson-Ryan recently had this interesting post online at Medium.

Among the notable reaction that post has generated, at “Dorf on Law,” Michael C. Dorf has a post titled “A Nice Place to Live, But You Wouldn’t Want to Visit.”

At “PrawfsBlawg,” Paul Horwitz has a post titled “The Home-Institution Benefits of Visiting Stints.”

And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Josh Blackman has a post titled “The Costs of a Look-See Visit.”

“Roberts Will Preside But Not Reign Over the President’s Impeachment”: John O. McGinnis has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog.

“In 2020, watch for these blockbuster Supreme Court cases”: Marcia Coyle of PBS NewsHour has this report.

“Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivers personal message to SF’s new DA, Chesa Boudin”: Evan Sernoffsky of The San Francisco Chronicle has this report.