“Agents seized this mom’s $15,000 in a raid. Now the Supreme Court may weigh in to help her.” Mario Ariza has this front page article in today’s edition of The South Florida Sun Sentinel.

“Judges challenge DeSantis attorney about fairness of Amendment 4 bill; ‘Isn’t it punitive to say, “I will reinfranchise this group, but not reinfranchise this group?”‘ one judge asked”: Lawrence Mower of The Tampa Bay Times has a report that begins, “Three federal judges hearing a legal challenge to a Florida measure allowing felons to vote asked tough questions of the attorney for Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday, repeatedly asking about the fairness of a subsequent bill that levied what critics called a ‘poll tax.'”

You can access via this link the audio of today’s oral argument before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

“Chains, Shackles and Threats: Testimony on Torture Takes a Dramatic Turn; In a hearing at Guantánamo Bay, an architect of the C.I.A. interrogation program said he told the accused mastermind of the 9/11 attacks: ‘I will cut your son’s throat.'” Carol Rosenberg of The New York Times has this report.

And Terry McDermott of The Los Angeles Times reports that “CIA psychologist says he threatened to kill 9/11 plotter’s son.”

“Federal court says Arizona ‘ballot harvesting’ law discriminates against minority voters”: Andrew Oxford has this front page article in today’s edition of The Arizona Republic.

In today’s edition of The Arizona Daily Star, Howard Fischer has a front page article headlined “Appeals court: Arizona’s law banning ‘ballot harvesting’ is illegal.”

Bob Christie and Jacques Billeaud of The Associated Press report that “Appeals court throws out Arizona ballot harvesting law.”

John Bowden of The Hill reports that “Court rules Arizona GOP’s ballot law discriminates against minorities.”

MacKinley Lutes-Adlhoch of Cronkite News reports that “Court voids state ‘ballot harvesting’ ban, out-of-precinct voting rule.”

Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson of Bloomberg Law reports that “Arizona Ballot Laws Tossed, U.S. Supreme Court Review Likely.”

And Brad Poole of Courthouse News Service reports that “En Banc Ninth Circuit Tosses Arizona Voting Rules as Discriminatory.”

You can access yesterday’s 7-to-4 ruling of an en banc panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at this link.

“The Fifth Circuit & the Finality Trap; The en banc Fifth Circuit can disarm its finality trap, which occasionally precludes appeals when plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss some of their claims”: Bryan Lammon has this post at his “final decisions” blog.

“Appeals Court Finds Arizona Intended To Suppress Nonwhite Votes; Because racism”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“As Clarence Thomas arrives to teach, some students protest”: Sarah Nelson has this front page article in today’s edition of The Gainesville Sun.

“Clarence Thomas speaks, but leaves many questions unanswered, in documentary”: Film critic Michael O’Sullivan of The Washington Post has this review of the new movie “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words.”

Online at National Review, Kyle Smith has a movie review headlined “The Misunderstood Clarence Thomas: A superb documentary delivers a measure of justice to an extraordinary justice.”

Online at The Washington Post, columnist Kathleen Parker has a related essay titled “This may be Joe Biden’s worst nightmare.”

Episode 35 of “The Byron York Show” podcast is titled “Behind The Scenes Of The New Clarence Thomas Movie.”

And ManifoldProductions has posted trailers for the movie on YouTube here and here, and you can access additional video clips from the movie on YouTube via this link.

“Injunction upheld in campaign case; panel says Arkansas law likely unconstitutional”: Linda Satter of The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette has this report.

And Mary Anne Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law reports that “Arkansas’ Campaign Contribution ‘Blackout Period’ Halted” (subscription may be required for full access).

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at this link.