“Attorneys ask U.S. Supreme Court to consider Tennessee’s refugee resettlement lawsuit”: Joel Ebert of The Tennessean has this report.

The Supreme Court of Indiana held an in-person oral argument today in a car crash case, and the justices did not even sit at least six feet apart: You can view the oral argument video via this link.

And Katie Stancombe of The Indiana Lawyer reports on the oral argument in an article headlined “Supreme Court hears arguments in stoplight crash suit against IPL.”

“We Held an Election During the 1918 Flu Epidemic. We Can Hold an Election Now.” David H. Gans has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“Coronavirus: Ohio Supreme Court moving to rule quickly on primary election dispute.” Randy Ludlow of The Columbus Dispatch has this report.

“Supreme Court Relaxes Filing Deadlines Due to Coronavirus”: Jordan S. Rubin of Bloomberg Law has this report.

“Ohio Supreme Court chief justice calls for ‘uniform buy-in’ among judges in response to coronavirus pandemic”: Cory Shaffer of The Cleveland Plain Dealer has this report.

“What next for oral arguments?” Tom Goldstein has this post at “SCOTUSblog.”

“New Zealand Eases Abortion Restrictions; The change was welcomed by abortion rights advocates, but even in that camp some wondered if lawmakers had gone too far”: Richard Pérez-Peña has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

And Amelia Wade of The New Zealand Herald reports that “Abortion law reform passes third reading.”

“Big Supreme Court opinions could come amid coronavirus outbreak; LGBT rights, gun rights and immigration all on tap during this term”: Todd Ruger of Roll Call has this report.

“The Quorum Rule”: Jack Metzler has posted this paper, forthcoming in the Green Bag 2d, online at SSRN.

“Watchdog Group Demands Probe of D.C. Circuit Judge’s Retirement”: Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson and Madison Alder of Bloomberg Law have a report that begins, “Demand Justice, a progressive judicial watchdog group, is asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to investigate whether Judge Thomas Griffith’s recently-announced decision to retire violated ethics rules.”

“Fight for Justice Blackwell’s Seat Heads to Ga. Supreme Court, Teeing Up Potential Conflict of Interest; The Georgia Court of Appeals on Thursday transferred an emergency appeal over whether to reinstate an election for state Supreme Court Justice Keith Blackwell’s seat to the state Supreme Court for a ruling”: R. Robin McDonald of The Daily Report of Fulton County, Georgia has this article.

“Dela. Supreme Court: Companies can pick forum for shareholders’ Section 11 claims.” Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post.

“Brennan’s Best or the Court’s Worst?” John O. McGinnis has this post at the redesigned “Law & Liberty” blog.

“Coronavirus may force tech-averse Supreme Court into modern era”: Joan Biskupic of CNN has this report.

Sixth Circuit judge who concurred in part and dissented in part from the majority’s resolution offers his own proposed majority opinion if only a colleague had joined with him: These are unusual, perhaps even unprecedented times for many, many reasons. Yesterday, however, for the first time in this blog’s nearly 18 years of existence, a federal appellate judge writing separately issued his own proposed majority opinion that merely lacked the vote of a second colleague on the three-judge panel.

The judge who did that was Sixth Circuit Judge Chad A. Readler. His opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part issued yesterday can be accessed here. and the portion of his opinion in which he shares how he would have written the majority opinion, if only his position had garnered another vote, begins at this link following the statement, “Were I to write the contract interpretation section of the majority opinion, it would read something like this:”

“Outbreaks of disease have shuttered the Supreme Court going back more than 2 centuries”: Mark Walsh has this report online at ABA Journal.