“After losing election, state Supreme Court Justice Daniel Kelly signals he will participate in voter rolls case”: Patrick Marley of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has this report.

“Can you argue in pajamas? Lawyers get ready for first-ever Supreme Court oral arguments by phone.” Tucker Higgins of MSNBC has this report.

“The Supreme Court Should Never Go Back to Its Pre-coronavirus Ways; The Court’s decision to make oral arguments more accessible and transparent is unprecedented — and should be the norm even after the pandemic”: Law professor Melissa Murray has this essay online at The Atlantic.

“Abortion during coronavirus: State bans, closed clinics, self-induced miscarriages.” Molly Hennessy-Fiske of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

“Courtroom access: Faced with a pandemic, the Supreme Court pivots.” Amy Howe has this post at ‘SCOTUSblog.”

“Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Censorship of Writings by Ex-Officials; The plaintiffs will appeal; They argued that a system that requires review before publication is unconstitutionally ‘dysfunctional'”: Charlie Savage of The New York Times has this report.

“Donald Trump Threatens to Adjourn Congress Unilaterally in What Would Be Unprecedented Power Grab”: Dahlia Lithwick has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate, along with a jurisprudence essay titled “The States Dispute Is the Latest Manifestation of Trump’s Distorted View of His Own Power; Trump has consistently shown that he would prefer that his presidential power be absolute.”

And online at Vox, Ian Millhiser has an essay titled “Trump’s threat to adjourn Congress and make recess appointments, explained; Trump wants to do something that literally no president has done before.”

“Governors and Mayors, Beware: Lawsuits Opposing Coronavirus Mitigation Orders Are a Real Threat.” David Golove has this post at the “Just Security” blog.

And recently at the “Harvard Law Review Blog,” Lindsay F. Wiley and Steve Vladeck had a post titled “COVID-19 Reinforces the Argument for ‘Regular’ Judicial Review — Not Suspension of Civil Liberties — In Times of Crisis.”

“When Court Moves Online, Do Dress Codes Still Matter? The legal profession is rooted in tradition, but social distancing is upending old norms. One judge in Broward County, Fla., asked lawyers to keep it professional during videoconferencing calls.” Jacey Fortin has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

“Masterpiece Cakeshop owner in court again for denying LGBTQ customer; Christian business owner Jack Phillips is being sued by a transgender woman who tried to order a trans-themed birthday cake from his Colorado bakery”: Nico Lang of NBC News has this report.

And Amanda Pampuro of Courthouse News Service reports that “Christian Baker Asks Judge to Toss Suit Over Unbaked Transgender Birthday Cake; Colorado-based Masterpiece Cakeshop says a transgender woman jumped the gun by suing over its refusal to make a cake to commemorate her transition.”

“Pandemic or No, SCOTUS Remains Camera-phobic”: Michael C. Dorf has this post at his “Dorf on Law” blog.

Therein, he writes: “[W]ith this announcement, the Supreme Court boldly adopts the equivalent of a revolutionary new technology of the 1890s: live radio.”

“Adrian Vermeule’s Sixteenth-Century Constitutionalism”: James Ceaser has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog.

“Trump says he can adjourn Congress. He’s misreading the Constitution. Congressional autonomy isn’t up for debate.” Law professor Steve Vladeck has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Michigan Republican Party loses appeal in attempt to stop redistricting commission”: Ryan Boldrey of MLive has this report.

And Kevin Koeninger of Courthouse News Service reports that “Michigan Redistricting Commission Greenlit by the Sixth Circuit.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit at this link.

“Appeals court again rebukes Cleveland federal judge over opioid litigation narrowing case against large pharmacy chains”: Eric Heisig of The Cleveland Plain Dealer has this report on a decision granting mandmamus relief that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued yesterday.

“American sentenced to 45 years prison for role in al Qaeda bomb attack”: Brendan Pierson of Reuters had this report back in March 2018.

Today, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued this decision rejecting the defendant’s challenges to his criminal convictions.

“Online University Not Subject to Student’s Suit in Massachusetts”: Martina Barash of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued yesterday.

Senior Circuit Judge Bruce M. Selya‘s opinion for a unanimous three-judge panel begins, “The appeal in this case requires us to explore the frontiers of personal jurisdiction in the internet age.”