“Judge Blocks Trump Officials’ Attempt to End Transgender Health Protections; The decision arrived a day before a Trump administration rule narrowing the legal definition of sex discrimination was set to take effect”: Margot Sanger-Katz and Noah Weiland of The New York Times have this report.
Samantha Schmidt of The Washington Post reports that “Federal judge blocks Trump administration from ending transgender health-care protections.”
Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar of The Associated Press reports that “Trump rule on transgender health blocked at the 11th hour.”
Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “U.S. judge blocks Trump rule on LGBT health discrimination.”
Devan Cole of CNN reports that “Federal judge blocks Trump administration’s rollback of Obama-era transgender health care protections.”
Susannah Luthi of Politico reports that “Judge halts Trump’s rollback of transgender health protections; Monday’s decision didn’t address other provisions of Trump’s revised nondiscrimination rules.”
Nathaniel Weixel of The Hill reports that “Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump transgender health rule from taking effect.”
And Zoe Tillman of BuzzFeed News reports that “A Judge Blocked The Trump Administration’s Effort To Roll Back Transgender Healthcare Protections; The court ruling is one of the first to apply the US Supreme Court’s expansion of employment protections for LGBTQ individuals to other areas.”
You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York at this link.
“Insurers Entitled to Obamacare Cost-Sharing Pay, Court Says”: Mary Anne Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law has this report on two rulings (access here and here) that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued Friday.
“A Justice for Our Time”: Kody W. Cooper has this post about Justice Clarence Thomas at the “Law & Liberty” blog.
“The Militias Against Masks: Groups protesting lockdown measures see the coronavirus pandemic as a pretext for tyranny — and as an opportunity for spreading rage.” Luke Mogelson has this article in the August 24, 2020 issue of The New Yorker.
“Federal appeals court won’t let grand juror speak out on the investigation into Michael Brown’s death”: Robert Patrick of The St. Louis Post-Dispatch has this report.
And Joe Harris of Courthouse News Service reports that “Eighth Circuit Rules Grand Juror Can’t Speak Out About Michael Brown Case.”
You can access Friday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at this link.
“D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed: Year Six?” Aaron L. Nielson has this post at the “Notice & Comment” blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation.
For the past 5+ years, Nielson has written a blog post at the end of each week summarizing the D.C. Circuit‘s rulings — while simultaneously offering lots of other relevant and interesting commentary. Sadly, the answer he has supplied to his current post’s title is “Nope!”
“Sixth Circuit Rules Ohio Chiropractors Must Wait 30 Days Before Soliciting Injured Drivers”: Kevin Koeninger of Courthouse News Service has this report.
And Mary Anne Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law reports that “Ohio Chiropractors Lose Fight Against Direct Solicitation Rule” (subscription required for full access).
You can access last Thursday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit at this link.
“Federal court rules all-male military draft is constitutional”: Lauren Meier of The Washington Times has this report.
Rebecca Kheel of The Hill reports that “Federal appeals court rules male-only draft constitutional.”
And in commentary, at his “Dorf on Law” blog, Michael C. Dorf has a post titled “Vertical Precedent in the Challenge to Male-Only Draft Registration (and Beyond).”
You can access last Thursday’s per curiam ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit at this link.
“Appeals court affirms federal death sentence for Kaboni Savage, notorious Philly drug kingpin”: Jeremy Roebuck of The Philadelphia Inquirer has this report.
And Matt Miller of The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania reports that “Murderous Pa. drug trafficker can’t escape his 13 federal death sentences, U.S. court rules.”
You can access last week’s 201-page ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at this link.
“A court has ruled that Connecticut’s governor and public health commissioner have broad authority to force residents into involuntary medical quarantines”: Edmund H. Mahony of The Hartford Courant has this report on a ruling that a partially divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued Friday.
“CBS Beats Copyright Claims Over ‘Star Trek: Discovery.'” Blake Brittain of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued today.
“Court throws out Tiffany’s judgment against Costco over fake ‘Tiffany’ rings”: Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has this report.
And Blake Brittain of Bloomberg Law reports that “Tiffany’s $21 Million Trademark Award Against Costco Sent Back” (subscription required for full access).
You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit at this link.
“Federal court blocks Hillary Clinton deposition in watchdog lawsuit”: Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times has this report.
Veronica Stracqualursi and Katelyn Polantz of CNN report that “Hillary Clinton doesn’t have to testify in lawsuit over her emails, appeals court rules.”
Adam Shaw and Bill Mears of Fox News report that “Federal appeals court overturns order for Hillary Clinton to sit for deposition on private email use; Clinton has argued that she has already answered questions about the controversy.”
Josh Gerstein of Politico reports that “Appeals court nixes Hillary Clinton deposition on emails; D.C. Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins suggested it was time to consign the Clinton email imbroglio to the history books.”
And Harper Neidig of The Hill reports that “Appeals court blocks Hillary Clinton deposition on private email server.”
You can access Friday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit at this link.
“A College’s ‘Free Speech Areas’ Face Supreme Court Review; The justices will consider whether a student’s First Amendment lawsuit may proceed after a college in Georgia abandoned its restrictions”: Adam Liptak will have this new installment of his “Sidebar” column in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.
