“Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick, Writing Against the ‘Presumption of Constitutionality'”: Eugene Volokh has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”

“More Torture for Michael Flynn; The D.C. Circuit goes to great lengths to keep his prosecution going”: This editorial appeared in yesterday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

And The New York Sun has published an editorial titled “Regarding D.C. Circuit v. Flynn: Go Ahead, Kid Me.”

“Federal court overturns order blocking ICE arrests in Mass. courthouses”: Jeremy C. Fox and Shelley Murphy have this article in today’s edition of The Boston Globe.

Joe Dwinell of The Boston Herald has an article headlined “Big win for ICE agents operating in Massachusetts courts.”

Steph Solis of The Republican of Springfield, Massachusetts reports that “Federal court vacates ruling that blocks immigration arrests at Massachusetts courthouses.”

And Thomas F. Harrison of Courthouse News Service reports that “First Circuit Lifts Block of ICE Arrests at Massachusetts Courthouses.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit at this link.

“Former Oregon Supreme Court Justice Hans A. Linde dies at 96”: Lizzy Acker of The Oregonian has this report.

And Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports that “Hans A. Linde, Iconoclastic Legal Scholar, Dies at 96; As a justice on the Oregon Supreme Court, he was a proponent of the new judicial federalism of the 1970s, which grounded civil rights protections in state constitutions.”

“Surveillance program that gathered Americans’ phone data was illegal, court finds”: Devlin Barrett of The Washington Post has this report.

Raphael Satter of Reuters has a report headlined “U.S. court: Mass surveillance program exposed by Snowden was illegal.”

Andrew O’Reilly and Bill Mears of Fox News report that “Federal appeals court finds NSA phone metadata program illegal; The court upheld the conviction of four Somali immigrants charged in a terror-fundraising case.”

Josh Gerstein of Politico reports that “Court rules NSA phone snooping illegal — after 7-year delay; But the controversial phone metadata program played little role in the terror-fundraising case at issue, the long-awaited ruling says.”

And Harper Neidig of The Hill reports that “Appeals court rules NSA’s bulk phone data collection illegal.”

You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at this link.

“Religious freedom is not a license to ignore civil-rights laws”: This editorial appeared in yesterday’s edition of The Los Angeles Times.

“Sanofi, BMS must face revived whistleblower suit over Plavix marketing”: Brendan Pierson of Reuters has this report (subscription required for full access) on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued yesterday.

“Age-Tracking Ruled Too Onerous a Guard Against Kiddie Porn”: Emilee Larkin of Courthouse News Service has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued yesterday.

“Black Pa. man can sue state trooper he claims arrested him based only on his race, U.S. appeals court says”: Matt Miller of The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued yesterday.

“Judge Justin Walker on Bar Bureaucracies, Mental Illness, and More”: Eugene Volokh recently had this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”

“New Jersey’s Large Capacity Magazine Ban Survives Challenge”: Bernie Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access).

And online at Reason, Brian Doherty has a post titled “3rd Circuit Federal Appeals Court Says Large-Capacity Magazine Bans Are OK; Last month, the 9th Circuit said the opposite; It’s a question the Supreme Court might have to resolve.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at this link.

“Integrating Originalism and Stare Decisis”: Marc O. DeGirolami has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog.

“A new poll shows rank-and-file Democrats finally realize the Supreme Court is important; The GOP’s long-standing advantage in judicial politics is eroding fast”: Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox.

Offering a different view, online at NBC News, Justin Clark has an essay titled “Trump’s judicial nominees are his legacy — and why we cannot elect Joe Biden; The president has always been committed to appointing jurists who understand, respect and follow the Constitution; The Democrats are not.”

“A Sometimes-Forgotten Link: The Importance of State Court Cases Before SCOTUS.” Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog.