“What Trump Pick Amy Coney Barrett Could Mean for Future of the Supreme Court; Judge’s legal approach is to look at what constitutional language meant when adopted and zero in on the text of legislation, rather than interpret lawmakers’ purpose”: Jess Bravin, Brent Kendall, and Jacob Gershman of The Wall Street Journal have this report.

“Expect liberal rulings from the ‘most conservative’ court; It’s a fallacy to think the Supreme Court can be reduced to push-button predictability based on the politics of the justices”: Columnist Jeff Jacoby has this essay online at The Boston Globe.

“The Supreme Court hasn’t been this conservative since the 1930s”: Joan Biskupic of CNN has this news analysis.

“I’ve known Amy Coney Barrett for over 20 years. Her intellect and heart are unrivaled. Yes, she is brilliant. And, yes, she is a principled, careful judge. But she also is one of the most generous people whom I have ever met.” Law professor Nicole Garnett has this essay online at USA Today.

“Here’s How Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Trump’s Newest Supreme Court Nominee, Has Ruled On Abortion, Immigration, And Policing; Barrett has consistently sided with her fellow Republican appointees on the bench”: Zoe Tillman of BuzzFeed News has this report.

“A High-Stakes Test for Joe Biden’s Love of Senate Tradition: He reveres custom and recognizes the courts’ essential role in shaping a policy agenda; Those dual instincts have perhaps never been in greater conflict as they are in this Supreme Court fight.” Matt Flegenheimer, Alexander Burns, and Katie Glueck will have this article in Sunday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Democrats Don’t Want to Get Personal in Debate Over Barrett; Joseph Biden and Democrats are wary of criticism of Judge Amy Coney Barrett that could be perceived as personal attacks; They will focus on the real-world impact she might have as a Supreme Court justice on health care and access to abortion”: Shane Goldmacher and Katie Glueck will have this article in Sunday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Democrats can’t stop Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation. They can show how she would take away our rights.” Law professor Erwin Chemerinsky has this essay online at The Los Angeles Times.

And online at The New York Times, Chemerinsky has an essay titled “Are Republican Judges Putting Their Thumbs on the Electoral Scale? Recent decisions certainly suggest as much.”

“In Amy Coney Barrett, conservatives see the Supreme Court champion they’ve longed for”: David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

“Tumultuous path to sixth conservative justice puts Supreme Court in the middle of political fray”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report.

“Amy Coney Barrett, a disciple of Justice Scalia, is poised to push the Supreme Court further right”: Michael Kranish, Robert Barnes, Shawn Boburg, and Ann E. Marimow of The Washington Post have this report.

“Amy Coney Barrett’s Stare Decisis Problem — And Ours: She respects precedent less than Antonin Scalia meaning she’s ready to join Clarence Thomas and start taking a hammer to long standing decisions.” Law professor Garrett Epps has this essay online at Washington Monthly.

“Trump Announces Barrett as Supreme Court Nominee; In choosing Judge Barrett, the president opted for a candidate who is likely to draw sharp lines on some of the most divisive disputes in American life”: Peter Baker and Nicholas Fandos of The New York Times have this report.

“What Kind of Judge Is Amy Coney Barrett? Her appellate-court opinions on gun rights and regulatory power are models of careful originalism.” David B. Rivkin Jr. and Andrew M. Grossman have this essay online at The Wall Street Journal.

“Trump picks conservative Amy Coney Barrett for Supreme Court”: Zeke Miller, Lisa Mascaro, and Mary Clare Jalonick of The Associated Press have this report.

“Trump officially names Amy Coney Barrett as Supreme Court nominee at White House; The president announced Saturday that he had chosen the federal appeals court judge to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died eight days ago”: Lauren Egan and Julie Tsirkin of NBC News have this report.

“Amy Coney Barrett, likely high court pick, is Scalia’s heir”: Michael Tarm of The Associated Press has this report.

“How the new Supreme Court could stymie a Biden presidency; A larger, emboldened conservative majority would have the power to upend decades of precedent to block a Democratic president and Congress from fulfilling their agenda”: Alex Guillén and Paul Demko of Politico have this report.

“A useful litmus test for the next Supreme Court justice”: Columnist George F. Will has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Trump Taps Amy Coney Barrett — Memo Lays Out Tactics for Opposition; A new memo spells out the myriad options available to Sen. Chuck Schumer to delay confirmation of a new Supreme Court justice”: Ryan Grim of The Intercept has this report.

“Why the Democrats won’t pack the Supreme Court”: Columnist Rich Lowry has this essay online at The New York Post.

“Supreme Court fight pushes Senate toward brink”: Jordain Carney of The Hill has this report.

And Julia Musto of Fox News reports that “Sen. Tom Cotton launches ‘Supreme Court War Room’ to defend Trump’s nominee; Cotton’s initiative will track attacks on the nominee and provide rapid response to push back.”

“Shifting from a 5-4 to a 6-3 Supreme Court majority could be seismic; Court conservatives won’t need Chief Justice Roberts’s vote to advance their agenda”: Law professors Leah Litman and Melissa Murray have this essay online at The Washington Post.

“This is the Supreme Court’s tipping point”: David Cole has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Honoring and Remembering Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg”: Harvard Law School has posted this video on YouTube.

And Brett Milano of Harvard Law Today has a related report headlined “‘It’s hard to imagine a more consequential life’; Harvard Law professors remember Ruth Bader Ginsburg as a teacher, inspiration and friend.”

“The legal theories of Amy Coney Barrett, explained: An expert explains originalism, the Roberts Court, and what a Justice Barrett might do.” Dylan Matthews of Vox has this interview of Keith Whittington.

“SCOTUS Contender Amy Coney Barrett’s Mixed Record in Criminal Cases; While the 7th Circuit judge is often skeptical of the government’s position, some of her conclusions will give pause to civil libertarians”: Jacob Sullum has this post online at Reason.

“Judge Amy Coney Barrett has shown me how to both live my faith and serve my country; Judge Barrett is an inspiration to me and undoubtedly to many others like me”: Maggie Garnett has this essay online at Fox News.

“Notable legal opinions of Trump’s planned U.S. Supreme Court pick Barrett”: Jan Wolfe of Reuters has this report.

“How Amy Coney Barrett Would Reshape the Court — And the Country: More than two dozen legal thinkers game out what President Trump’s new Supreme Court pick means for America’s biggest legal fights, the court’s reputation, the fate of its ‘swing seat’ and more.” Politico Magazine has this report.

“Amy Coney Barrett Deserves to Be on the Supreme Court; I disagree with Trump’s judicial nominee on almost everything; But I still think she’s brilliant”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion.

“Barrett’s Record: A Conservative Who Would Push the Supreme Court to the Right; As an appeals court judge, her opinions have reflected those of her mentor, Justice Antonin Scalia, but with few of his occasional liberal rulings.” Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

“Barrett Clerked for Scalia. Conservatives Hope She’ll Follow His Path. For years, the conservative movement has been searching for someone who could lead American jurisprudence to the right with the kind of intellectual rigor that conservatives say made Justice Antonin Scalia so effective for decades.” Michael D. Shear and Elizabeth Dias of The New York Times have this report.

“My 5-year-old asked Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, ‘Have you ever made a mistake?’ Here’s her answer.” Mark Shavin has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“The bombshell consequences of Amy Coney Barrett”: Columnist Ruth Marcus has this essay online at The Washington Post.