“Evers asks Supreme Court to expedite lawsuit over capacity limits for bars, restaurants”: Molly Beck of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has this report.

“Pa. Democrats enter the homestretch fearing the Supreme Court will throw out votes”: Jonathan Tamari, Andrew Seidman, Julia Terruso, and Jonathan Lai of The Philadelphia Inquirer have this report.

“Options for Biden’s Supreme Court Reform Commission”: Law professor Michael C. Dorf has this essay online at Justia’s Verdict.

And at his “Dorf on Law” blog, he has a related post titled “Is There Time for a Switch in Time?“

“Er, Can I Ask a Few Questions About Abortion? You know who really reduced abortion numbers in the U.S.? President Obama, with the Affordable Care Act.” Columnist Nicholas Kristof has this op-ed in today’s edition of The New York Times.

“In Voting Cases, Chief Justice Roberts Is Alone but in Control; While the chief justice’s views have not been fully endorsed by any of his colleagues, they have so far prevailed in five recent disputes, delivering victories to both Democrats and Republicans”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

“SCOTUS Election Law Kremlinology — Or How Brett Kavanaugh Might Yet Save the Republic”: Michael C. Dorf has this post at his blog, “Dorf on Law.”

“Justice Barrett May Inspire Pro-Life Votes for Trump; Suburban women and religious voters like his judicial appointments, even if his character makes them leery of a second term”: Nicole Ault will have this op-ed in Friday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

Also in tomorrow’s edition of that newspaper, Curt Levey will have an op-ed titled “The Barrett Battle That Wasn’t: This confirmation was supposed to be especially hard; How did it turn out to be especially easy?“

“The Obamacare Case for Dummies (and everyone else)”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law.”

“Who’s Ready for Another Bush v. Gore? The Supreme Court ponders ruling on late ballots — after Nov. 3.” The Wall Street Journal has published this editorial.

“The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Sure Are Pushing Some Crazy Legal Theories Lately; And they all lead to the mass disqualification of mail ballots”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“7-6 court decision rejects higher hurdle for disability discrimination lawsuits”: Michael Karlik of Colorado Politics has this report on an en banc ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued yesterday.

“Tossing FACTA class action, en banc 11th Circuit says courts, not Congress, decide when risk is real”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post about a 7-to-3 en banc ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued yesterday.

“Why the Supreme Court let some states count mail-in ballots received after Election Day but not others”: Ariane de Vogue of CNN has this report.

“Amy Coney Barrett joins the Supreme Court in unprecedented times”: Joan Biskupic of CNN has this report.

“The New Court’s Docket; Not all constitutional cases of enduring consequence make the front page”: John O. McGinnis has this post at the “Law & Liberty” blog.