“Biden’s Supreme Court reform commission won’t fix anything; The president’s new commission has a lot of fans — in the Federalist Society”: Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox.

And online at The Los Angeles Times, columnist Michael McGough an essay titled “Biden’s Supreme Court panel should listen to Justice Breyer.”

“Supreme Court to hear cases by phone through remainder of current session”: Joan Biskupic of CNN has this report.

“The Supreme Court’s Religious Persecution Complex: Under the guise of ‘religious liberty,’ the conservative justices are privileging certain Americans at the expense of the rest of us.” Katherine Stewart has this essay online at The New Republic.

“Techies give an old fashioned Supreme Court decent marks in coding case”: John Fritze of USA Today has this report.

“By 5-4 Vote, Supreme Court Lifts Restrictions on Prayer Meetings in Homes; The court shifted direction in cases on Covid-related limits on religious services after Justice Amy Coney Barrett replaced Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report on a per curiam decision that the U.S. Supreme Court issued last night.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court strikes another pandemic-related restriction on religious services.”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court Orders California to Allow in-Home Prayer Meetings; In 5-4 decision, justices said religious gatherings are entitled to the least restrictive measures applied to secular activities.”

And Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times reports that “SCOTUS strikes down California ban on in-home worship meetings; Roberts joins liberals in dissent.”