“What Is Neil Gorsuch’s Deal With Masks? For one of the Court’s proudest culture warriors, ‘common courtesy during a deadly pandemic’ is apparently a lot to ask.” Yvette Borja has this post at Balls and Strikes.

“Inside a Supreme Court Argument”: You can access today’s new installment of the “Advisory Opinions” podcast, featuring David French and Sarah Isgur, via this link.

“The Supreme Court Case That Could Upend Efforts to Protect the Environment: The potential ramifications of West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency are profound.” Elizabeth Kolbert has this Daily Comment online at The New Yorker.

And Pamela King and Jeremy P. Jacobs of Greenwire have an article headlined “Meet the lawyers teeing up the Supreme Court climate showdown.”

“The Pulse of the Court: Recap of the Supreme Court Arguments on the Vaccine-or-Testing Mandate.” You can access today’s new episode of the “Gray Matters” podcast, hosted by law professor Jennifer Mascott with guest Steve Lehotsky, via this link.

“Justice for Snowflake”: You can access today’s new episode of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast, featuring law professors Leah Litman, Kate Shaw, and Melissa Murray, via this link.

Access online the contents of the January 2022 issue of the Harvard Law Review: Via this link.

Therein, law professor Stephen E. Sachs has an article titled “Originalism: Standard and Procedure.”

The issue also contains a Note titled “Textualism’s Mistake,” which begins, “In 1920, seventeen-year-old Salvatore Eugene Scalia arrived in the United States from Italy with his family.”

The Harvard Law Review Forum will be publishing two responses to Professor Sachs’ article, including one by Fifth Circuit Judge Andrew S. Oldham, but neither appears online yet.

“Jobseeking Keeps My Ego in Check”: Justice William W. Bedsworth of California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal has this essay online at The Recorder.

“If the Supreme Court lets other states copy Texas’s abortion law, it’ll be chaos; The court is accelerating our country’s polarization”: Law professor Jon D. Michaels has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Spotlighting guideline circuit split, two Justices express ‘hope’ US Commission will be back ‘in near future'”: Douglas A. Berman has this post at his “Sentencing Law and Policy” blog.

“Why Doesn’t the Supreme Court Want Workers to Be As Safe From Covid as They Are? The court’s conservative justices are opposed to vaccine ‘mandates’ not because they’re anti-vax but because they’re anti-labor.” Elie Mystal has this essay online at The Nation.

“Most released due to McGirt have been charged either federally or tribally, Tulsa World analysis finds”: Curtis Killman of The Tulsa World has this report.

“Supreme Court lets stand decision that McGirt not retroactive”: Chris Casteel of The Oklahoman has this report.

And Curtis Killman of The Tulsa World has an article headlined “Supreme Court: McGirt not retroactive; Oklahoma’s appeals still on the table.”

Access today’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court: At this link. The Court granted review in three cases and called for the views of the Solicitor General in two cases.

And in Guerrant v. United States, No. 21-5099, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a statement, in which Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined, respecting the denial of certiorari.

“Andre Mathis — Nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit”: Harsh Voruganti has this post at his blog, “The Vetting Room.”