“Katherine Magbanua trial in Dan Markel murder a go for next week”: Karl Etters of The Tallahassee Democrat has this report.

“Tech groups ask Supreme Court to block Texas social media law; The emergency application follows a surprise ruling in a lower court Wednesday that allowed the law to take effect”: Cat Zakrzewski of The Washington Post has this report.

And Rishi Iyengar of CNN Business reports that “Tech groups ask Supreme Court to put Texas social media censorship law on hold.”

You can view at this link the emergency filing today with the U.S. Supreme Court.

“An Abortion Miss for Politicized Science; The Lancet, a medical journal, decides it has expertise in American law”: This editorial will appear in Saturday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“Abortion-Pill Providers Prepare to Reach Patients in Restrictive States; As Roe v. Wade decision looms, telemedicine groups in the U.S. and abroad experience a surge in patients”: Dominique Mosbergen will have this article in Saturday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“The Supreme Court and the End of the Democratic Century: With Roe v. Wade seemingly set to be overturned, it’s worth remembering how fickle history can be.” Professor Seth Masket has this essay online at Politico Magazine.

“Protesters rally outside US supreme court justices’ homes ahead of pro-choice marches; Protests have been occurring since the leak as organizations prepare for a nationwide day of marches on Saturday”: Lauren Burke of The Guardian (UK) has this report.

“Move to Scrap Roe Opens Justices to ‘Politicians in Robes’ Label”: Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson of Bloomberg Law has this report.

“A Memory in the Making: Our Classical Legal Tradition.” Brian Tamanaha has this post at the “Balkinization” blog, wherein he writes, “We are currently witnessing the birth of a new entrepreneurial memory, what Adrian Vermeule calls our ‘classical legal tradition.'”

“Justice Aborted”: Sherry F. Colb has this blog post at “Dorf on Law.”

“Two GOP judges just stripped social media companies of basic First Amendment rights; The First Amendment doesn’t apply to Republicans anymore?” Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox.

“Professor Steven Mazie”: Is the guest on today’s new episode of the “Supreme Myths” podcast, hosted by law professor Eric Segall.

Two other recent episodes featured their title guests, “Professor Jennifer Mascott” and “Professor Steve Vladeck.”

“Texas can resume child abuse investigations for transgender care, Supreme Court says”: Chuck Lindell of The Austin American-Statesman has this report.

J. David Goodman of The New York Times reports that “Top Texas Court Allows Abuse Inquiries of Parents of Transgender Children; But the court said Gov. Greg Abbott did not have the authority to order such investigations, acknowledging they could cause ‘irreparable harm.’”

And Eleanor Klibanoff of The Texas Tribune reports that “Texas Supreme Court allows child abuse investigations into families of transgender teens to continue; The high court also raised questions about why the state opened these investigations in the first place, noting that the child welfare agency is not bound by directives from the governor.”

Today’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas consists of a majority opinion written in part by two different Justices, a concurring opinion, and an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

“The 5th Circuit’s Reinstatement of Texas’ Internet Censorship Law Could Break Social Media”: Mark Joseph Stern has this essay online at Slate.

“France Must Again Face Shipwreck Recovery Interference Claims”: Daniel Seiden of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued yesterday.

“Synopsys Appeal in FOIA Suit Came Too Late, Ninth Circuit Says”: Samantha Hawkins of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued yesterday.

In which Circuit Judge Forrest issues an anti-forest dissenting opinion: A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued this decision yesterday.

“AIG Escapes Trademark Claims From Same-Named Insurance Agency”: Blake Brittain of Bloomberg Law had this report back in June 2020.

Today, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued this decision reversing the federal district court’s entry of summary judgment.

“Text and History for Thee but Not for Me? The Court makes other people follow the text and history, but at least when it comes to certiorari, the justices lose their religion.” Ben Johnson has this guest post at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” where he has been guest blogging this week about his recent article titled “The Origins of Supreme Court Question Selection.”

“4th Circ. Erases Order Granting Detainees New Bond Hearings”: Alyssa Aquino of Law360 has this report (subscription required for access) on a 73-page ruling that a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued yesterday in which each of the judges on the panel issued an opinion.

“Abortion has only been legal in Missouri for 49 years; Here’s what came before Roe v. Wade”: Jonathan Shorman of The Kansas City Star has this report.

“I Invented Gilead. The Supreme Court Is Making It Real. I thought I was writing fiction in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Margaret Atwood has this essay online at The Atlantic.

“Samuel Alito’s Right to Privacy”: Alissa Walker has this post at the “Curbed” blog of New York magazine.

“The other scary thing about Alito’s draft ruling on abortion”: Jonathan Capehart has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Dalla-Longa argues that Magnetar’s agreement to accept papers by email in the arbitration proceedings extends to service of motion papers in the district court to vacate the arbitration award. We are not persuaded.” Yesterday, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued this cautionary tale.

“N.Y. County Rule on Surrendering Rifles Hits Constitutional Snag”: Bernie Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on a per curiam decision that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued yesterday.

“Challenging secrecy in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel”: Stephanie Krent and Larry Siems have this essay online at Columbia Journalism Review.

“Federal judiciary ‘vulnerable’ to cyberattacks, U.S. lawmakers told”: Nate Raymond of Reuters has this report.

“House Democrats to Pursue Broader Supreme Court Security Bill”: Madison Alder of Bloomberg Law has this report.

“What’s the ius in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization?” Kevin C. Walsh has this post at the “Mirror of Justice” blog.

“No more murder charge for women in Louisiana abortion bill”: Kevin McGill of The Associated Press has this report.

“The Abortion Converts: We used to be anti-abortion; Why did we change our minds?” Sarah Jones has this post at the “Intelligencer” blog of New York magazine.

“Overturning Roe Will Not Make America More Democratic”: Columnist Jamelle Bouie has this essay online at The New York Times.

And online at The New York Review, Sherrilyn Ifill has an essay titled “Stealing the Crown Jewels: Justice Alito purports to place the future of abortion in the hands of women voters—despite abetting the disenfranchisement of Black and Latina women” (subscription required for full access).