“Alito Doesn’t Want Your Contraceptives; Listen to what the Justices said about Griswold and privacy”: This editorial will appear in Monday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“With Roe seemingly undone, other rights dating back to contraceptives case could fall under attack”: Milton J. Valencia has this front page article in today’s edition of The Boston Globe.

“Alito’s Master Stroke, Between Precedent and Original Meaning; His Dobbs draft opinion clears away the underbrush”: Law professor Jennifer Mascott has this letter to the editor online at The Wall Street Journal.

“The Resurrection of State Nullification — And the Degradation of Constitutional Supremacy: SB8 and the Blueprint for State Copycat Laws.” Lauren Moxley Beatty has posted this essay online at SSRN.

“Justice Alito’s draft on abortion — Part I: the reasoning.” Lyle Denniston has this blog post, along with blog posts titled “Justice Alito’s draft on abortion — Part II: the result” and “Justice Alito’s draft on abortion — Part III, the ripple effect.”

“Abortion rights backers rally in anger over post-Roe future”: Ashraf Khalil and David Sharp of The Associated Press have this report.

“Justice Thomas Should Take a Long Look in the Mirror”: Columnist Jesse Wegman has this essay online at The New York Times.

“Most Texans do not want Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade, new poll shows; But they do support banning abortion after a certain number of weeks, according to the Dallas Morning News-University of Texas at Tyler poll”: BeLynn Hollers of The Dallas Morning News has this report.

“Stephen Breyer retired. Why not Kagan and Sotomayor?” Matthew Adarichev has this essay online at LI Herald.

“Too Much Church in the State”: Columnist Maureen Dowd will have this op-ed in Sunday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Primaries spotlight coming battles over state supreme courts”: Andrew DeMillo and Gary D. Robertson of The Associated Press have this report.

“The End of Roe v. Wade: For a constitutional scholar and pro-choice Democrat, there are reasons to endorse the leaked draft opinion overturning the 1973 abortion decision—and to see it as vindication for a range of liberal priorities.” Law professor Akhil Reed Amar has “The Saturday Essay” in today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“Justice Thomas Says Leaked Opinion Destroyed Trust at the Supreme Court; In remarks at a conference in Dallas, he also denounced the recent protests at justices’ homes and said conservatives would not adopt such tactics”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Clarence Thomas says Supreme Court leak has eroded trust in institution; ‘You begin to look over your shoulder. It’s like kind of an infidelity,’ he said in speech to conservatives.”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Clarence Thomas Criticizes Supreme Court Leak of Draft Opinion on Roe v. Wade; Justice tells a Dallas audience that a lack of trust at the court ‘changes the institution fundamentally.’”

John Fritze of USA Today has an article headlined “Justice Thomas laments leak of draft Supreme Court abortion opinion: ‘Kind of an infidelity.’”

Edward Helmore of The Guardian (UK) reports that “Clarence Thomas calls leak of supreme court abortion draft ‘tremendously bad’; Conservative US justice fears permanent damage to ‘fragile’ institution and decries protests at justices’ homes.”

Alex Woodward of The Independent (UK) reports that “Clarence Thomas says leak of opinion to overturn Roe is like an ‘infidelity’ that eroded trust in Supreme Court; Long-serving sitting justice tells right-wing think tank that opinion leak was ‘tremendously bad.’”

Jessica Gresko of The Associated Press reports that “Clarence Thomas says abortion leak has changed Supreme Court.”

Shawna Mizelle and Joan Biskupic of CNN report that “Thomas says Supreme Court after leaked draft opinion is ‘not the court’ of Ginsburg’s era.”

Lawrence Richard of Fox News reports that “Clarence Thomas says ‘tremendously bad’ abortion draft leak changed the Supreme Court ‘forever’; ‘What happened at the court is tremendously bad,’ Thomas said.”

Josh Gerstein of Politico reports that “Thomas blasts disclosure of draft Supreme Court opinion as ‘tremendously bad’; ‘That trust … is gone forever,’ high court’s longest-serving sitting justice declares.”

Caroline Vakil of The Hill reports that “Clarence Thomas says Roe draft leak has changed court, eroded trust.”

Mary Papenfuss of HuffPost reports that “Suspicious Clarence Thomas Complains He’s ‘Looking Over’ His Shoulder Since Leak; Thomas called the leak ‘tremendously bad’ for the court and ‘kind of an infidelity.’”

You can view the video of Justice Clarence Thomas’s remarks last night in Dallas on Vimeo via this link.

“Katherine Magbanua trial in Dan Markel murder a go for next week”: Karl Etters of The Tallahassee Democrat has this report.

“Tech groups ask Supreme Court to block Texas social media law; The emergency application follows a surprise ruling in a lower court Wednesday that allowed the law to take effect”: Cat Zakrzewski of The Washington Post has this report.

And Rishi Iyengar of CNN Business reports that “Tech groups ask Supreme Court to put Texas social media censorship law on hold.”

You can view at this link the emergency filing today with the U.S. Supreme Court.

“An Abortion Miss for Politicized Science; The Lancet, a medical journal, decides it has expertise in American law”: This editorial will appear in Saturday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“Abortion-Pill Providers Prepare to Reach Patients in Restrictive States; As Roe v. Wade decision looms, telemedicine groups in the U.S. and abroad experience a surge in patients”: Dominique Mosbergen will have this article in Saturday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“The Supreme Court and the End of the Democratic Century: With Roe v. Wade seemingly set to be overturned, it’s worth remembering how fickle history can be.” Professor Seth Masket has this essay online at Politico Magazine.

“Protesters rally outside US supreme court justices’ homes ahead of pro-choice marches; Protests have been occurring since the leak as organizations prepare for a nationwide day of marches on Saturday”: Lauren Burke of The Guardian (UK) has this report.

“Move to Scrap Roe Opens Justices to ‘Politicians in Robes’ Label”: Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson of Bloomberg Law has this report.

“A Memory in the Making: Our Classical Legal Tradition.” Brian Tamanaha has this post at the “Balkinization” blog, wherein he writes, “We are currently witnessing the birth of a new entrepreneurial memory, what Adrian Vermeule calls our ‘classical legal tradition.'”

“Justice Aborted”: Sherry F. Colb has this blog post at “Dorf on Law.”

“Two GOP judges just stripped social media companies of basic First Amendment rights; The First Amendment doesn’t apply to Republicans anymore?” Ian Millhiser has this essay online at Vox.

“Professor Steven Mazie”: Is the guest on today’s new episode of the “Supreme Myths” podcast, hosted by law professor Eric Segall.

Two other recent episodes featured their title guests, “Professor Jennifer Mascott” and “Professor Steve Vladeck.”

“Texas can resume child abuse investigations for transgender care, Supreme Court says”: Chuck Lindell of The Austin American-Statesman has this report.

J. David Goodman of The New York Times reports that “Top Texas Court Allows Abuse Inquiries of Parents of Transgender Children; But the court said Gov. Greg Abbott did not have the authority to order such investigations, acknowledging they could cause ‘irreparable harm.’”

And Eleanor Klibanoff of The Texas Tribune reports that “Texas Supreme Court allows child abuse investigations into families of transgender teens to continue; The high court also raised questions about why the state opened these investigations in the first place, noting that the child welfare agency is not bound by directives from the governor.”

Today’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas consists of a majority opinion written in part by two different Justices, a concurring opinion, and an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

“The 5th Circuit’s Reinstatement of Texas’ Internet Censorship Law Could Break Social Media”: Mark Joseph Stern has this essay online at Slate.

“France Must Again Face Shipwreck Recovery Interference Claims”: Daniel Seiden of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued yesterday.

“Synopsys Appeal in FOIA Suit Came Too Late, Ninth Circuit Says”: Samantha Hawkins of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued yesterday.

In which Circuit Judge Forrest issues an anti-forest dissenting opinion: A divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued this decision yesterday.

“AIG Escapes Trademark Claims From Same-Named Insurance Agency”: Blake Brittain of Bloomberg Law had this report back in June 2020.

Today, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued this decision reversing the federal district court’s entry of summary judgment.

“Text and History for Thee but Not for Me? The Court makes other people follow the text and history, but at least when it comes to certiorari, the justices lose their religion.” Ben Johnson has this guest post at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” where he has been guest blogging this week about his recent article titled “The Origins of Supreme Court Question Selection.”

“4th Circ. Erases Order Granting Detainees New Bond Hearings”: Alyssa Aquino of Law360 has this report (subscription required for access) on a 73-page ruling that a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued yesterday in which each of the judges on the panel issued an opinion.

“Abortion has only been legal in Missouri for 49 years; Here’s what came before Roe v. Wade”: Jonathan Shorman of The Kansas City Star has this report.

“I Invented Gilead. The Supreme Court Is Making It Real. I thought I was writing fiction in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Margaret Atwood has this essay online at The Atlantic.

“Samuel Alito’s Right to Privacy”: Alissa Walker has this post at the “Curbed” blog of New York magazine.