“ABC Puts Supreme Court Drama on Its Docket; The network has ordered a pilot for ‘Judgement,’ about a candidate for a spot on the high court”: Rick Porter of The Hollywood Reporter has this article.

Update: In other coverage, Joe Otterson of Variety reports that “ABC Orders Legal Drama Pilot ‘Judgement’ From Joey Falco.”

And Peter White of Deadline reports that “Joey Falco Lands ‘Judgement’ Legal Soap Pilot At ABC.”

“The Supreme Court Case That Could Upend Elections: J. Michael Luttig, a retired judge, discusses how Moore v. Harper could impact our democracy; Plus, Susan Orlean on the death of a snack food.” You can access today’s new episode of The New Yorker Radio Hour with David Remnick via this link.

“Two Trump-Appointed Judges Rebuke a Third for Bending the Law in His Favor; The reversal of a district judge’s intervention in the Mar-a-Lago documents investigation shows the complexity of former President Donald J. Trump’s judicial legacy”: Charlie Savage and Alan Feuer of The New York Times have this news analysis.

“Supreme Court to Hear Student Debt Forgiveness Case; The justices left in place an injunction blocking the Biden administration’s authority to forgive up to $20,000 in debt per borrower”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

You can access yesterday’s order of the U.S. Supreme Court at this link.

“Trump Strikes Out Before His Judges: Guess whose appointees keep putting the law above political loyalty?” This editorial will appear in Saturday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“Of Free Speech, Non-Discrimination, and the Futility of Originalism”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law.”

“Are federal judges violating the Constitution when they hire their clerks?” Columnist Ruth Marcus has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“‘Terrible mistake’: Dershowitz urges Netanyahu to spare Supreme Ct, scrap ‘override’; The staunch Israel supporter, once referred to by PM-designate as ‘one of the world’s greatest lawyers,’ says Israel’s Supreme Court is ‘the jewel of judiciaries around the world'”: Tobias Siegal of The Times of Israel has this report.

“I will tell Supreme Court speech must be kept free, that you don’t lose your rights when you start work; Free speech is on trial because Colorado wants to force a designer to violate her rights”: Kristen Waggoner has this essay online at Fox News.

Online at The Hill, David Boaz has an essay titled “The Supreme Court has another chance to uphold religious liberty for small business owners.”

And online at The American Prospect, law professor Marc Spindelman has an essay titled “The ‘Dobbs’ Promise Gets Tested at the Supreme Court; A Supreme Court case being heard next week will begin to test whether the elimination of rights in ‘Dobbs’ will remain limited to abortion.”

“With another heated Wisconsin election around the corner, Republicans hope to defuse abortion as a driving issue”: Corrinne Hess of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has an article that begins, “Wisconsin’s Republican leaders don’t want the state Supreme Court election to be a one-issue contest focused on abortion, with the prospect of a lawsuit challenging the state’s abortion ban potentially heading to the court next year.”

“Dispute over North Carolina congressional districts tees up major elections case at Supreme Court; The justices will consider whether to endorse a conservative theory that could limit power of state courts to review election-related laws enacted by legislatures”: Lawrence Hurley of NBC News has this report.

“Same-Sex Marriage Returns to Supreme Court in Web Designer’s Free Speech Bid; Website designer wants to exclude same-sex wedding couples; Opponents say the case poses risks to anti-discrimination laws”: Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News has this report.

And Andrew Chung of Reuters reports that “Web designer opposed to gay marriage at center of U.S. Supreme Court clash.”