Divided Third Circuit panel addresses whether an order denying a motion for summary judgment challenging the existence of a Bivens cause of action is an immediately appealable collateral order: You can access today’s ruling at this link. The majority answers “no,” while Circuit Judge Thomas M. Hardiman issued a dissenting opinion explaining why he would answer “yes.”

“In Post-Roe World, These Conservatives Embrace a New Kind of Welfare; Some conservative thinkers are pushing Republicans to move on from Reagan-era family policy and send cash to families; A few lawmakers are listening”: Dana Goldstein of The New York Times has this report.

“The Second Amendment’s Legal Landscape Is Getting Weirder; The Supreme Court’s Bruen decision has given rise to some disturbing new interpretations of what constitutes the right to bear arms”: Matt Ford of The New Republic has this report.