“Supreme Court Rules Against Andy Warhol in Copyright Case; The justices considered whether the artist was free to use elements of a rock photographer’s portrait of the musician Prince”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court rules against Warhol Foundation in Prince photo copyright case.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court rejects Andy Warhol’s use of copyrighted photo of Prince.”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Image of Prince Breaches Copyright Laws; Closely watched case pitted photographer against artist.”

John Fritze of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol in copyright case with implications for artists.”

And Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times reports that “Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol in ‘Prince Series’ copyright dispute.”

“Supreme Court Dismisses Case on Pandemic-Era Immigration Measure; The justices acted after the Biden administration announced that the health emergency used to justify the measure, Title 42, was ending”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report on an order that the U.S. Supreme Court issued today.

“Two GOP senators smear a witness to defend Clarence Thomas”: Columnist Ruth Marcus has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Dodging Fight Over Bruce Babbitt, Clinton Nominates Stephen Breyer; ‘Orrin, you won this one,’ Howard Metzenbaum snarled”: Ed Whelan has this post at his “Confirmation Tales” Substack site.

“Justice Stevens’ papers let researchers peek into Supreme Court’s inner workings”: Mark Walsh has this report online at ABA Journal.

“Behind the scenes in 2000 when Supreme Court liberals thought Nazi and Dred Scott references in gay rights dissent were distracting”: Joan Biskupic of CNN has this report.