“The Arrogance of Samuel Alito”: Columnist Jamelle Bouie has this essay online at The New York Times.

Online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has a Jurisprudence essay titled “Samuel Alito Just Took an Indefensible Jab at the Progressive Justices.” And law professor Steven Lubet has a Jurisprudence essay titled “Samuel Alito Inadvertently Made the Best Case for Supreme Court Ethics Reform.”

“Trump’s Case Has Broad Implications for American Democracy; The third indictment of the former president is the first to get to the heart of the matter: Can a sitting leader of the country spread lies to hold onto power even after voters reject him?” Peter Baker of The New York Times has this news analysis.

And online at Slate, law professor Rick Hasen — founder of the “Election Law Blog” — has a Jurisprudence essay titled “U.S. v. Trump Will Be the Most Important Case in Our Nation’s History.”

“Our Samuel Alito Scoop Is No Scandal: Ruth Marcus thinks she smells a rat; The truth is that partisanship has dulled her nose for news.” James Taranto will have this op-ed in Wednesday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“The Supreme Court: Where Everyone Knows Your Name.” Jake Trucott has this post at the “Empirical SCOTUS” blog.

“John Roberts can’t get a Supreme Court ethics code. Alito’s interview shows why.” Joan Biskupic of CNN has this news analysis.