“What the Supreme Court Should Not Do in Trump’s Disqualification Case”: Law professor Gerard N. Magliocca has this guest essay online at The New York Times.

Also online at The New York Times, columnist Jamelle Bouie has an essay titled “If Trump Is Not an Insurrectionist, What Is He?“

“Fishermen go to Supreme Court saying they may lose family business over federal regulation; Case challenges 1984 Chevron ruling that requires judges to defer to federal agencies”: Alex Swoyer and Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times have this report.

“Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Idaho’s Strict Abortion Ban; The court also temporarily reinstated the state law, which the Biden administration said conflicts with a federal statute on emergency-room care”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Ann E. Marimow of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court to decide if U.S. law requires some emergency room abortions; The Justice Department challenged an Idaho abortion ban, saying federal law requires emergency room doctors to perform abortions in some circumstances.”

Jess Bravin and Laura Kusisto of The Wall Street Journal report that “Supreme Court to Rule on Emergency Abortions; Justices will hear arguments on whether states can restrict Medicare-funded hospitals from providing an abortion to stabilize a patient.”

John Fritze of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court allows Idaho’s near-total abortion ban in emergency room in blow to Biden.”

And Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times reports that “Supreme Court sides with Idaho in challenge to state’s strict abortion law.”

Access online today’s orders of the U.S. Supreme Court granting review: The order granting review in Trump v. Anderson can be accessed here.

And the order granting review in Moyle v. United States can be accessed here.

“Why Trump can’t use the ‘idiot’ defense other Jan. 6 defendants often lean on; Capitol rioters and their lawyers often concede they were ‘gullible’ for believing 2020 election lies; Donald Trump’s lawyers have to argue his concerns were fact-based and reasonable”: Ryan J. Reilly of NBC News has this report.

“Trump Ballot Challenges Advance, Varying Widely in Strategy and Sophistication; Donald J. Trump’s eligibility for the presidential ballot has been challenged in more than 30 states, but only a handful of those cases have gained traction so far”: Jenna Russell, Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs, and Mitch Smith of The New York Times have this report.

“Michael Avenatti asks 2nd Circuit to dump conviction for cheating Stormy Daniels; The disbarred California attorney says his wire fraud and identity theft convictions should be reversed because of the trial judge’s ‘prejudicial’ instructions to jurors”: Josh Russell of Courthouse News Service has this report.

You can access the audio of today’s oral argument before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit at this link.

“Uber’s Consumer Contract Faces Hostile Massachusetts High Court; Company claims pop-up arbitration agreement is enforceable; Victim of car crash asks court to green light $60 million lawsuit”: Allie Reed of Bloomberg Law has this report.

You can view the video of today’s oral argument before the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts via this link. Michael R. Huston argued the appeal for Uber; Matthew W.H. Wessler argued for the plaintiff-appellee.

“Idaho Can’t Enforce Abortion ‘Trafficking’ Ban During Appeal”: Mary Anne Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law has this report.

“Trump Hires Attorney Behind Texas Abortion Law for Supreme Court Ballot Fight; Jonathan Mitchell, ex-Texas solicitor general, hired by Trump; Backed $10,000 bounties at heart of state’s abortion law”: Erik Larson and Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News have this report.

“Here’s what the Supreme Court faces as justices discuss Trump’s eligibility”: Joan Biskupic of CNN has this news analysis.

“Florida abortion amendment gets enough signatures for 2024 ballot; The constitutional amendment still needs the approval of the Florida Supreme Court to qualify”: Romy Ellenbogen of The Tampa Bay Times has this report.

“Pa. Superior Court’s Next Leader Looks Ahead to Looming Challenges in Coming Years; ‘The other big challenge that I’m particularly attuned to is making sure that we are developing a lot of younger attorneys who are capable and proficient at oral argument,’ Lazarus said”: Aleeza Furman of The Legal Intelligencer has this report.