“Lowe’s can’t sway US appeals court to ditch Calif. Supreme Court’s pro-worker precedent”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Reuters has this post.

“The Case for Removing Trump From the Ballot Has a Fatal Originalist Flaw; There were no state ballots to speak of when the 14th Amendment was drafted”: Professor Brook Thomas has this Jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“Judge Newman’s Reinstatement Odds Wane as Judge Limits Suit; 96-year-old judge’s preliminary injunction request denied; Most counts of her suit dismissed at request of her colleagues”: Michael Shapiro of Bloomberg Law has this report.

Blake Brittain of Reuters reports that “US court mostly rejects 96-year-old judge’s lawsuit over suspension; Pauline Newman sued Federal Circuit council over competency investigation, suspension; Separate D.C. court rejects request to reinstate judge or move investigation.”

And at the “IPWatchdog” blog, Steve Brachmann and Eileen McDermott have a post titled “Judge Cooper Denies Injunction But Keeps Newman Case Alive on Key Counts.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia at this link.

“The Eleventh Circuit’s ‘Both-Questions’ Path Around Johnson v. Jones; The Eleventh Circuit says that it can review the genuineness of fact disputes in qualified-immunity appeals so long as the defendant also challenges the existence of a clearly established constitutional violation”: Bryan Lammon has this post at his “final decisions” blog.

“Ninth Circuit says California Supreme Court, not SCOTUS, gets last word on state labor law”: Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle has this report on a decision that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued yesterday.

“Abortion Pill Case Highlights Supreme Court Flip on Who Can Sue; Justices apply procedural rules that can dictate outcome; Conservatives, liberals have switched tactics over the years”: Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson of Bloomberg Law has this report.

“Why a Supreme Court easy out in Trump ballot battle could lead to post-election chaos”: John Fritze and Marshall Cohen of CNN have this report.

“Judiciary Braces for Case Spike If Supreme Court Guts Chevron; Supreme Court could strike deference to agencies; Ruling could result in bigger workload across judiciary”: Suzanne Monyak of Bloomberg Law has this report.

“Despite ties to defendants, Texas Supreme Court justice didn’t recuse himself from sex abuse case; Two decades ago, John Devine worked with the law firm of Paul Pressler and Jared Woodfill, later defendants in a Southern Baptist abuse case”: Robert Downen of The Texas Tribune has this report.

“Trump Lawyer Reads the Constitution Like a Secret Code Requiring Decryption”: Law professor Michael C. Dorf has this essay online at Justia’s Verdict.

Also online there, law professor Vikram David Amar has an essay titled “The Supreme Court’s Oral Argument in Trump v. Anderson: The Court’s Seeming Failure to Understand Some Basic Starting Points.”

“In the Shadow of Oliver Wendell Holmes”: Jill Lepore has this guest post at the “Balkinization” blog.

“Dobbs v. Brown”: Law professor Andrew Coan has posted this essay online at SSRN.

“Votin’ for Lincoln”: You can access today’s new episode of the “Divided Argument” podcast via this link.

“Five Observations and a Rant About the Trump Disqualification Case”: Eric Segall has this blog post at “Dorf on Law.”

And at the “Balkinization” blog, Samuel Moyn has a guest post titled “‘Liberal Originalism,’ Rest in Peace,” while Mark Graber has a post titled “The Dunning School, Historical Error, and Oral Argument in Anderson v. Griswold.”

“Supreme Court Seeks Special Counsel’s Response to Trump Bid for Trial Delay; Special counsel given until next Tuesday to file his brief; Trump seeks to pause trial while he presses bid for immunity”: Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News has this report.

“The Pervasive Influence of Political Composition on Circuit Court Decisions”: Alma Cohen has posted this paper online at SSRN.

“How to Actually Guarantee the Right to Vote; A six-point checklist”: Law professor Richard L. Hasen — founder of the “Election Law Blog” — has this essay online at The Atlantic.

I recently received a review copy of Hasen’s newest book, “A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy,” which officially goes on sale one week from today.

“Ninth Circuit Gets Tangled Up in Minimum Contacts and Due Process”: Ingrid (Wuerth) Brunk has this post at the “Transnational Litigation Blog.”