“Riggs, Griffin spar over proper forum for NC Supreme Court election dispute”: The Carolina Journal has this report.
“Supreme Court Seems Ready to Back Texas Law Limiting Access to Pornography; The law, meant to shield minors from sexual materials on the internet by requiring adults to prove they are 18, was challenged on First Amendment grounds”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.
Justin Jouvenal of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court seems likely to allow Texas law requiring age verification to access porn; The justices appeared skeptical of a challenge to the law brought by an adult-content industry group, producers of pornographic material and a porn actress.”
David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court leans in favor of state-enforced age limits on porn websites.”
Maureen Groppe of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court justices bring personal experience to debate over blocking internet porn from kids; Evaluating the constitutionality of a Texas law requiring age verification for pornographic web sites, Supreme Court justices said content filtering doesn’t work.”
Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times reports that “Supreme Court reviews Texas law requiring age verification to access adult websites.”
Pooja Salhotra of The Texas Tribune reports that “U.S. Supreme Court weighing constitutionality of Texas’ age-verification requirement for porn sites; The Supreme Court’s decision on Texas’ law, which adult entertainment website attorneys said were the most overreaching in the country, could determine the fate of similar laws in more than a dozen other states.”
In commentary, online at Vox, Ian Millhiser has an essay titled “The Supreme Court seems eager to curb First Amendment protections for porn; A major free speech argument about pornographic websites went disastrously for the porn industry.”
And online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has a Jurisprudence essay titled “The Supreme Court Changed Its Mind About Online Porn.”