How Appealing



Thursday, September 25, 2025

“Thomas signals no slowdown to precedent purge; Thomas said the justices shouldn’t ‘turn off their brain’ to precedents that no longer make sense”: Kelsey Reichmann of Courthouse News Service has this report.

Posted at 11:09 PM by Howard Bashman



“Trump Gets the Retribution He Sought, and Shatters Norms in the Process; A prosecutor’s drive to indict James Comey trampled over the Justice Department’s long tradition of keeping a distance from politics and the White House, and raised the prospect of more arbitrary charges”: Alan Feuer, Jonah E. Bromwich, and Maggie Haberman of The New York Times have this news analysis.

Posted at 9:46 PM by Howard Bashman



“The Supreme Court and Trump’s Firing Power; Maybe it was a mistake all along to empower a vast D.C. bureaucracy”: This editorial will appear in Friday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

Posted at 9:44 PM by Howard Bashman



“Barrett spurns Supreme Court bias claims after string of Trump shadow docket wins; Justice Amy Coney Barrett sat for an extended discussion where she defended the high court’s rulings and her jurisprudence”: Kelsey Reichmann of Courthouse News Service has this report.

Posted at 9:42 PM by Howard Bashman



“The DNC is jumping into the 2025 Pa. Supreme Court fight to protect Democrats in November election; Concerned over conservatives’ efforts to realign the state’s highest court, Democrats are ramping up spending in what is usually a low-key Pa. race”: Carmen Russell-Sluchansky of WHYY has this report.

Chris Potter of WESA reports that “Financial reports show big-dollar donations in Pa. Supreme Court judicial retention contest.”

And in commentary, online at The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, columnist John Baer has an essay titled “Pa. Supreme Court retention elections are very different this year.”

Posted at 8:26 PM by Howard Bashman



“State Supreme Court calls foul on Pittsburgh’s ‘jock tax,’ adding to city’s financial headaches”: Julia Maruca of WESA has this report.

Today’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania consists of a majority opinion and two concurring opinions (here and here).

Posted at 1:57 PM by Howard Bashman



“Bonus 179: The Stare Decisis-Free Docket; The Court’s recent treatment of Humphrey’s Executor may only encourage lower-court judges to do exactly what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh purported to rail against in August: not follow precedents.” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site.

Posted at 10:22 AM by Howard Bashman