“Only men — again — are being considered for Utah’s two new Supreme Court spots; The 12 finalists are being considered for spots that opened when the Legislature, in response to anger about justices’ decisions, moved to expand the court”: Emily Anderson Stern of The Salt Lake Tribune has this report.

“Tortured in China, they want to sue Cisco. The Supreme Court may say no. The Supreme Court will soon decide whether members of the Falun Gong religious group can sue Cisco for its alleged role in a Chinese government crackdown.” Julian Mark and Eva Dou of The Washington Post have this report.

“Racism’s Over and Seashells Can Be Deadly; It was a devastating week for democracy thanks to the upside down law of the Trump Era”: You can access today’s new episode of Slate’s “Amicus” podcast via this link.

“This Could Be the Biggest Blow to Abortion Rights Since Roe Fell”: Jill Filipovic has this guest essay online at The New York Times.

“Supreme Court Asked to Restore Access to Abortion Pill by Mail; A federal appeals court temporarily halted a Food and Drug Administration regulation that has greatly expanded access to the abortion pill mifepristone”: Ann E. Marimow and Pam Belluck of The New York Times has this report.

Praveena Somasundaram, Rachel Roubein, and Justin Jouvenal of The Washington Post report that “Drugmakers ask Supreme Court to restore abortion pill access by mail; The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled that the commonly used abortion drug mifepristone can only be picked up in person.”

And Maggie Astor, Chris Hippensteel, and Pam Belluck of The New York Times report that “Abortion Providers Forced to Adapt After Court Blocks Pill Access by Mail; The Fifth Circuit court’s ruling, which is being appealed, reinstates a requirement that patients visit a health care provider in person to obtain mifepristone, upending abortion access in the United States.”

You can view the U.S. Supreme Court filings here and here.