“Trump’s Firing Power Ripples Through US Agencies After Court Win”: Zoe Tillman of Bloomberg News has this report.

“4 Takeaways From The Birthright Citizenship Decision; The outcome of Trump v. Barbara was not a surprise—but what happens next is uncertain”: David Lat has this post at his “Original Jurisdiction” Substack site.

“The weed killer America can’t afford to lose; A 7-2 Supreme Court decision protects Bayer from costly litigation over Roundup; Thank goodness”: Zachary Karabell has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“How the Tide Turned Against Transgender Athletes — and the Movement; Loss at Supreme Court this week leaves activists playing defense — even in blue states”: Louise Radnofsky of The Wall Street Journal has this report.

“Roberts Gets the 14th Amendment Wrong; In the 1860s, citizenship was not only extended but defined more narrowly than the chief justice acknowledges”: Law professor Richard A. Epstein has this essay online at The Wall Street Journal.

“Breyer Details Retirement Calculus for Leaving Supreme Court”: Matthew S. Schwartz of Bloomberg Law has this report.

“Trump May Ask Supreme Court to Rethink Carroll Appeal Denial”: Erik Larson of Bloomberg News has this report.

“The Supreme Court Can’t Save Digital Privacy”: Law professor Stephen L. Carter has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion.

“The Role of Originalism in Trump v. Barbara”: Lawrence Solum has this post at his “Legal Theory Blog.”

“Justice Stephen Breyer on Trump, the Rule of Law, and Whether the Supreme Court is Political”: Bloomberg Law has posted this video on YouTube.

“A Clarence Thomas Protégé Defied a Landmark Supreme Court Ruling. His Mentor Would Be Proud.” Austin Sarat has this Jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“This Supreme Court ruling would make the Constitution’s framers wince; The justices diminished Congress with a decision on presidential firing power”: Columnist George F. Will has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“With Fed independence on the line, Supreme Court left no room for questions; The high court’s unusual decision to release rulings on two separate appeals simultaneously created little doubt about the limits on partisan influence of the Federal Reserve”: Kelsey Reichmann of Courthouse News Service has this report.

“Despite some big losses, Supreme Court rewards Trump’s assertion of power”: Andrew Chung and John Kruzel of Reuters have this report.

“Rulings on women’s sports cap a year of setbacks for transgender advocates; This week’s Supreme Court decision upholding state bans on transgender athletes follows earlier rulings involving ‘transition care’ and parental notification”: Julian Mark of The Washington Post has this report.

“US Supreme Court to review Arizona’s ‘proof of citizenship’ voter law”: Howard Fischer of Arizona Capitol Times has this report.

“The Birthright Decision Was Surprisingly Close, Some Legal Scholars Say; A bare majority of Supreme Court justices ruled that President Trump’s executive order was unconstitutional, reflecting a conservative shift on the issue”: Amy Qin of The New York Times has this report.

“AP’s long-time Supreme Court reporter Mark Sherman reflects on front row seat to legal history”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.

“Another Major Precedent Crumbles at the Supreme Court. 3 Legal Scholars Assess the Fallout.” Law professors Kate Shaw, William Baude, and Stephen I. Vladeck have this guest essay discussion online at The New York Times.

“A fourth appeals court rejects ICE mass detention policy; A unanimous panel suggests the expanding legal fight is bound for the Supreme Court”: Kyle Cheney of Politico has this report.

You can access yesterday’s decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit at this link.

“‘Sad and solemn’: Family of Dan Markel mark 12 years since murder”: Jeff Burlew of The Tallahassee Democrat has this report.

“Appeals court upholds conviction of Charlie Adelson”: Jeff Burlew of The Tallahassee Democrat has this report.

You can access today’s decision of Florida’s First District Court of Appeal at this link.

“Takeaways From the Supreme Court’s Momentous Term With Trump; President notched both sweeping wins and losses as the court’s conservative majority marched on”: James Romoser of The Wall Street Journal has this report.

“Supreme Court expanded Trump’s power but was unwilling to go as far as he wanted; In a term in which the president’s policies dominated the docket, one dynamic explains why the court often ruled for him but didn’t always give him what he was seeking”: Justin Jouvenal of The Washington Post has this report.

“Despite Some Losses for Trump, Supreme Court Delivers Enduring Conservative Wins; The justices pushed back on some of President Trump’s signature moves, but they also expanded presidential power and supplied victories on long-sought conservative goals”: Ann E. Marimow and Abbie VanSickle of The New York Times have this news analysis.