“Immigration, religion and AR-15s on Supreme Court’s early docket as justices open new term”: Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times has this report.
“A Supreme Court Battle Over Climate Change Begins; The justices are about to hear a lawsuit that could determine whether the oil industry faces billions of dollars in liability for damages caused by global warming”: Karen Zraick of The New York Times has this report.
Justin Jouvenal of The Washington Post has an article headlined “Should Big Oil pay for climate change? A Supreme Court case will help decide. Boulder, Colo., is hoping its novel lawsuit will be the environmental equivalent of the landmark litigation that produced billions in damages and settlements against Big Tobacco and opioid makers.”
David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court to weigh whether oil companies can be forced to pay for climate damage.”
And Maureen Groppe and Trevor Hughes of USA Today have an article headlined “‘Rich hippies’ versus big oil. Supreme Court hears landmark climate change case. The case, the first the Supreme Court will hear when the justices return from their summer break on Oct. 5, is also one of the biggest it will consider this term.”
“Supreme Court heads into new term with one eye on President Trump”: John Fritze of CNN has this report.
“Comparing the Credentials Of Three Decades of Fifth Circuit Nominees; The Butler didn’t do it”: Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”
“Pepperdine University Caruso School of Law Celebrates 57 Years of Greater Purpose at Annual Law Dinner”: Jacqueline Cleaveland of Pepperdine University has this report.
“Trump. Climate. AR-15s. The Supreme Court is about to go back to work.” Maureen Groppe of USA Today has this report.
