“A ‘view’ from the courtroom: Just another (snowy) workday here.” Mark Walsh has this post at “SCOTUSblog.”

“SCOTUSblog” to partner with “Empirical SCOTUS” blog: The announcement is here. Next on the acquisition agenda is the “High School SCOTUS” blog.

“Do California public institutions of higher education and their employees have a duty of care to their students while in the classroom to warn them of and protect them from foreseeable acts of violence by fellow students?” At 10 a.m. pacific time (1 p.m. eastern time) tomorrow, the Supreme Court of California is scheduled to issue an opinion deciding this issue.

“Little confrontation at 7th Circuit nominees’ hearing”: Marilyn Odendahl of The Indiana Lawyer has this post.

And Michael Macagnone of Law360.com reports that “Trump 7th Circ. Picks Face Few Questions From Senate Panel” (subscription required for full access).

You can access via this link the video of today’s U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing.

“Trump takes swipe at his DOJ over illegal immigrant licenses case in Arizona”: Alex Pappas of Fox News has this report.

“Screnock for Supreme Court — Tuba”: Michael Screnock for Justice has posted this campaign ad on YouTube.

“Five Ways to Write Like Justice Kagan”: Ross Guberman has this post at LinkedIn.

“Marvin Gaye heirs prevail in appeal over ‘Blurred Lines’ plagiarism”: Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has this report.

And at the “THR, Esq.” blog of The Hollywood Reporter, Eriq Gardner has a post titled “‘Blurred Lines’ Verdict Upheld by Appeals Court in Win for Marvin Gaye Family; The 9th Circuit won’t order a new trial and affirms damage awards against Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams, while reversing an award against rapper T.I.”

You can access today’s ruling of a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at this link.

“Justices Skeptical About California Law Being Challenged By Anti-Abortion Clinics”: Nina Totenberg had this audio segment on yesterday evening’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered.”

“Chief Justice Rehnquist’s Correspondences with Tim O’Brien”: Josh Blackman has this blog post.

“Sixth Circuit Rejects First Amendment Challenge to Ohio’s Single Subject Rule for Initiatives”: At his “Election Law Blog,” Rick Hasen has this post on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued yesterday involving, among other things, proposed term limits for Justices of the Supreme Court of Ohio.

“Law Twitter Is Having a Fun Time Mocking Neil Gorsuch’s Writing Style”: Amanda Whiting of Washingtonian magazine has this post.

“Court: Mexican family can’t sue agent in cross-border death.” Kevin McGill of The Associated Press has a report that begins, “A U.S. Border Patrol agent who fired his gun in Texas and fatally wounded a teenager across the Mexican border in 2010 cannot be sued by the teen’s family, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday, in a ruling that cited diplomatic and national security concerns.”

You can access yesterday’s en banc ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit at this link.

“Death sentence reinstated for Mississippi’s only woman on death row”: Jimmie E. Gates has this front page article in today’s edition of The Clarion Ledger of Jackson, Mississippi.

And Jeff Amy of The Associated Press reports that “Court voids reprieve, returns Mississippi woman to death row.”

You can access yesterday’s 9-to-5 en banc ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit at this link.

Access today’s rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court in argued cases: The Court today issued rulings in two argued cases.

1. Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Manuel Ayestas v. Davis, No. 16-6795. Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a concurring opinion, in which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined. You can access the oral argument transcript at this link.

2. And Justice Stephen G. Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court in Marinello v. United States, No. 16-1144. Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined. You can access the oral argument transcript at this link.

“Charges consolidated for Magbanua”: Karl Etters of The Tallahassee Democrat has an article that begins, “Charges were consolidated against the woman accused of being a conduit between Dan Markel’s former in-laws and the hitmen investigators say shot him in his garage.”

“William Howard Taft and the Constitution”: The National Constitution Center has posted the video of this event from earlier this evening on YouTube.

I recently received a second review copy of Jeffrey Rosen’s new book, making me think that perhaps a give-away contest for interested readers of this blog may be in order.

“Justices Press California Over Law Challenged by Antiabortion Groups; State says FACT Act meant to inform pregnant women of rights to reproductive health care including abortion”: Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal has this report.

And Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Supreme Court Justices Cast Doubt on California Abortion-Disclosure Rules.”

“Appeals court considers ‘how long is too long’ in challenge to Guantanamo detention”: Ann E. Marimow and Missy Ryan of The Washington Post have this report.

“A Pro-Life Puzzler: Can a state compel anti-abortion clinics to provide information about free abortions?” Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“Supreme Court: Group Lawsuits Over IPOs Can Be Brought in State Courts; Unanimous ruling is loss for business, which prefers federal venues for shareholder litigation.” Dave Michaels of The Wall Street Journal has this report.

And Barbara Leonard of Courthouse News Service reports that “Kagan Defends Securities Class Actions in State Courts.”

“Federal appeals court upholds Utah’s controversial election law”: Dennis Romboy of The Deseret News has this report.

Lee Davidson and Dan Harrie of The Salt Lake Tribune report that “10th Circuit Court rules against Utah Republican Party’s attempt to overturn signature-gathering election law.”

And Michelle L. Price of The Associated Press reports that “Appeals court rules against Utah GOP, upholds nominating law.”

You can access today’s ruling of a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit at this link.

“The Canon Wars”: Law professors Anita S. Krishnakumar and Victoria Nourse have posted this book review on SSRN (via “Legal Theory Blog“).

“Commander v. Chief: The lessons of Eisenhower’s civil-rights struggle with his chief justice Earl Warren.” Michael O’Donnell has this book review in the April 2018 issue of The Atlantic.

“UCI Law presents The Supreme Court’s Past, Present and Future, a conversation with UCLA Law Prof. Adam Winkler and UCI Law Prof. Rick Hasen to discuss their newly released books”: The event will be livestreamed via this link beginning at 8:30 p.m. eastern time tonight.

“Chief Justice Roberts Is Reshaping The First Amendment”: Amelia Thomson-DeVeaux has this post at FiveThirtyEight.

“Even tort reformers can’t abide 9th Circuit’s notorious Hyundai ruling”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post.

“U.S. Supreme Court Backs Shareholder Lawsuits Over IPOs”: Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News has this report.

“Pa. Republican state legislator moves to impeach four state Supreme Court justices”: Liz Navratil of The Philadelphia Inquirer has this report.

And Patrick Cloonan of The Indiana (Pa.) Gazette reports that “Dush introduces legislation to impeach Supreme Court justices.”

“Judge blocks Mississippi 15-week abortion ban from going into effect”: Sarah Fowler of The Clarion Ledger of Jackson, Mississippi has this report.

Emily Wagster Pettus of The Associated Press reports that “Judge temporarily blocks Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban.”

And Sarah Mimms and Ema O’Connor of BuzzFeed News report that “Mississippi Passed The Most Restrictive Abortion Law In The Country, But A Court Has Just Put It On Hold.”

“Supreme Court Warily Eyes California Law Involving Abortion and Free Speech”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court questions California law requiring antiabortion centers to disclose that the state provides abortion services.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “California disclosure law for pregnancy centers faces skeptical questions in Supreme Court.”

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court skeptical of California law requiring information about abortion.”

Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court questions crisis pregnancy center law.”

Andrew Chung and Lawrence Hurley of Reuters report that “U.S. high court skeptical toward California law on anti-abortion centers.”

Josh Gerstein of Politico reports that “Supreme Court hostile to part of California law aimed at ‘crisis pregnancy centers’; Justices troubled by provisions forcing advertising disclosures on anti-abortion advocates.”

And in commentary, Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress has an essay titled “A law targeting deceptive anti-abortion clinics had a brutal day in the Supreme Court; The best case scenario for pro-choice advocates is a narrow opinion.”

You can access at this link the transcript of today’s U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, No. 16-1140.

“Scrunchies, Scourge of the 1980s, Are Back; The puffy hair accessory is now making appearances at work, raising questions about its place in the office; Justice Ginsburg’s decision”: Katherine Bindley will have this front page article in Wednesday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“Remembering Julie Hilden”: Michael Dorf has this post at “Dorf on Law.”

“Michael Scudder — Nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit”: At his blog “The Vetting Room,” Harsh Voruganti has a post that begins, “Richard Posner is a hard act to follow.”

Scudder is one of two nominees to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit who are scheduled to have their Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing tomorrow.

“Justice Brennan’s Correspondences with Barack Obama”: Josh Blackman has this blog post.